Re: telnetd broken in -CURRENT

2002-01-30 Thread Mark Murray
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 01:47:24PM +, Mark Murray wrote: > > No. We dont. But if Kerberos5 is asked for, then BSD telnet is linked > > against Heimdal. > > > > I'm testing the fix, and will commit in a day or two. > > OK, great. I assume you'll import it on the vendor branch? Yup! M --

Re: telnetd broken in -CURRENT

2002-01-30 Thread Jacques A. Vidrine
On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 01:47:24PM +, Mark Murray wrote: > No. We dont. But if Kerberos5 is asked for, then BSD telnet is linked > against Heimdal. > > I'm testing the fix, and will commit in a day or two. OK, great. I assume you'll import it on the vendor branch? -- Jacques A. Vidrine <[E

Re: telnetd broken in -CURRENT

2002-01-30 Thread Mark Murray
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 06:38:57PM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote: > > "Jacques A. Vidrine" wrote: > > > Meanwhile, do yourself a favor and use the Heimdal port if you want > > > Heimdal Kerberos. > > > > I think he cares more about telnet than Heimdal. > > Do we install the Heimdal telnetd as the

Re: telnetd broken in -CURRENT

2002-01-30 Thread Jacques A. Vidrine
On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 06:38:57PM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote: > "Jacques A. Vidrine" wrote: > > Meanwhile, do yourself a favor and use the Heimdal port if you want > > Heimdal Kerberos. > > I think he cares more about telnet than Heimdal. Do we install the Heimdal telnetd as the default telnetd

Re: telnetd broken in -CURRENT

2002-01-29 Thread Terry Lambert
"Jacques A. Vidrine" wrote: > Meanwhile, do yourself a favor and use the Heimdal port if you want > Heimdal Kerberos. I think he cares more about telnet than Heimdal. -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: telnetd broken in -CURRENT

2002-01-29 Thread Jacques A. Vidrine
On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 01:09:33AM -0500, Alexander N. Kabaev wrote: > > I had this problem with telnet some time ago. See PR bin/32591 at > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/32591 for a patch > which fixes the problem for me. The memory block is being freed > twice in the Heimdal co

Re: telnetd broken in -CURRENT

2002-01-28 Thread Vincent Poy
On Tue, 29 Jan 2002, Alexander N. Kabaev wrote: > I had this problem with telnet some time ago. See PR bin/32591 at > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/32591 for a patch > which fixes the problem for me. The memory block is being freed > twice in the Heimdal code. > > Unfortunately,

Re: telnetd broken in -CURRENT

2002-01-28 Thread Vincent Poy
On Mon, 28 Jan 2002, M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Vincent Poy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > : > You should: > : > ln -sf aj /etc/malloc.conf (As ROOT) > : > : Hmmm, what does that do exactly? I don't have a file name aj > : (what directory should it b

Re: telnetd broken in -CURRENT

2002-01-28 Thread Alexander N. Kabaev
I had this problem with telnet some time ago. See PR bin/32591 at http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/32591 for a patch which fixes the problem for me. The memory block is being freed twice in the Heimdal code. Unfortunately, PR got no attention whatsoever for over a month now. It is

Re: telnetd broken in -CURRENT

2002-01-28 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 07:43:43PM -1000, Vincent Poy wrote: > > You should: > > ln -sf aj /etc/malloc.conf (As ROOT) > > Hmmm, what does that do exactly? I don't have a file name aj > (what directory should it be in?) and I don't have a /etc/malloc.conf file > either which I assume is a

Re: telnetd broken in -CURRENT

2002-01-28 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Vincent Poy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : > You should: : > ln -sf aj /etc/malloc.conf (As ROOT) : : Hmmm, what does that do exactly? I don't have a file name aj : (what directory should it be in?) and I don't have a /etc/malloc.conf file : eithe

Re: telnetd broken in -CURRENT

2002-01-28 Thread Vincent Poy
On Mon, 28 Jan 2002, Siwei Liu wrote: > ? ??? 28 ?? 2002 07:15?Vincent Poy ??? > > I'm using KRB4/KRB5 in make.conf when building the latest -current > > sources, telnetd appears to be broken. > > > > vince@pele [9:14pm][~] >> telnet localhost > > Trying 127.0.0.1... > > Connected to localhost.WU

telnetd broken in -CURRENT

2002-01-27 Thread Vincent Poy
I'm using KRB4/KRB5 in make.conf when building the latest -current sources, telnetd appears to be broken. vince@pele [9:14pm][~] >> telnet localhost Trying 127.0.0.1... Connected to localhost.WURLDLINK.NET. Escape character is '^]'. telnetd in free(): error: chunk is already free Connecti