On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 10:13:05PM +0200, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 11:36:21PM +0200, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 11:55:32PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 10:38:23PM +0200, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> > > > I would like to repla
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 11:36:21PM +0200, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 11:55:32PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 10:38:23PM +0200, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> > > I would like to replace Giant with a local sx lock in sysvshm code.
> > > Looked really stra
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 11:55:32PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 10:38:23PM +0200, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> > I would like to replace Giant with a local sx lock in sysvshm code.
> > Looked really straightforward so maybe I missed something.
>
> At very least, the shmget
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 10:38:23PM +0200, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to replace Giant with a local sx lock in sysvshm code.
> Looked really straightforward so maybe I missed something.
At very least, the shmget_existing() is no longer functional.
The sx is owned around tsleep(
Hello,
I would like to replace Giant with a local sx lock in sysvshm code.
Looked really straightforward so maybe I missed something.
Patch: http://people.freebsd.org/~mjg/patches/sysvshm-giant-sx.patch
Inlined version for comments:
diff --git a/sys/kern/sysv_shm.c b/sys/kern/sysv_shm.c
index a1
