On 04/01/2012 03:39, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
Where is the code for this? Would committing your sade additions now
to a project branch in Subversion
be appropriate? That way folks could check it out from SVN, and
provide comments and patches,
and help push things along faster.
When your code is c
On 03-01-2012 18:33, Eitan Adler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In the the recent sysinstall thread there seems to be general agreement that
> having a post-install configuration tool is a good thing. Until such a
> tool is written I think it would be a good idea to use sysinstall for
> this purpose. I am will
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 4:55 PM, Bruce Cran wrote:
> There's a rewrite almost ready to go that supports ZFS etc. at
> http://butcher.heavennet.ru/sade/ - I'm hoping to find some time to finish
> it off and import it.
>
> --
> Bruce Cran
>
> ___
> freebsd-
On 04/01/2012 00:27, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
ATM it doesn't understand GEOM stuff (like mirror, stripe, raid, ...), but
patches
to change this and to clean it up internally are more than welcome.
There's a rewrite almost ready to go that supports ZFS etc. at
http://butcher.heavennet.ru/sade/
On Jan 3, 2012, at 3:33 PM, Eitan Adler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In the the recent sysinstall thread there seems to be general agreement that
> having a post-install configuration tool is a good thing. Until such a
> tool is written I think it would be a good idea to use sysinstall for
> this purpose.
Hi,
In the the recent sysinstall thread there seems to be general agreement that
having a post-install configuration tool is a good thing. Until such a
tool is written I think it would be a good idea to use sysinstall for
this purpose. I am willing to do the work to restore sysinstall and
maintai
