Hi,
Is there any documentation (or better, a HOWTO) on how to get firewall
functionality with netgraph bridging? I have DSL and 8 addresses and
I like the front machine to act as the firewall. I have this with
the old bridge and ipfw but as has been said before, it has problems.
Thanks,
Boyd
> I'd be happy to (I like a challenge) but I still require access to the
> standards for that. So my question still stands, does BSDi have IEEE
> subscriptions for FreeBSD developers to use, or are there any other ways
> for me to aquire (legally of course) the standards I need without having t
>
> > There's a Spanning Tree Protocol (STP) defined by IEEE 802.1D. I'd prefer
> > to have that, but I don't have the 1K US$ to shell out for that.
> > Does BSDi have IEEE subscriptions for FreeBSD developers to use?
>
>Please also consider implementing 802.1G, which is for bridging over PPP
>(B
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 12:19:16PM +0100, Rogier R. Mulhuijzen wrote:
> At 09:37 25-1-01 -0800, Archie Cobbs wrote:
> >Rogier R. Mulhuijzen writes:
> > > But from my list of wishes I'd say the first 3 are gone. All that's
> > left is
> > > spanning tree. I'm probably going to need this pretty soo
"Rogier R. Mulhuijzen" wrote:
>
> > > What I want to know is can I just link tap0.upper to a new bridge hook? It
> > > seems to me that is the case.
> >
> >yes I believe so..
> >you can hook as many interfaces as you want to the bridge node.
> >(but you probably don't want to BRIDGE to your cable
> > What I want to know is can I just link tap0.upper to a new bridge hook? It
> > seems to me that is the case.
>
>yes I believe so..
>you can hook as many interfaces as you want to the bridge node.
>(but you probably don't want to BRIDGE to your cable modem, but to ROUTE
>to it )
Don't wor
"Rogier R. Mulhuijzen" wrote:
>
> At 09:37 25-1-01 -0800, Archie Cobbs wrote:
> >Rogier R. Mulhuijzen writes:
> > > But from my list of wishes I'd say the first 3 are gone. All that's
> > left is
> > > spanning tree. I'm probably going to need this pretty soon, so once more
> > > I'm asking if an
Rogier R. Mulhuijzen writes:
> >Hmm.. you could also get that affect using log2(n) ng_tee(4) nodes..
>
> I don't see how though. Lets say I link only to left, right and left2right.
> Now when data enters left it will go to both right and left2right. When
> data enters right it goes to left. But
At 09:37 25-1-01 -0800, Archie Cobbs wrote:
>Rogier R. Mulhuijzen writes:
> > But from my list of wishes I'd say the first 3 are gone. All that's
> left is
> > spanning tree. I'm probably going to need this pretty soon, so once more
> > I'm asking if anyone is working on it. If not I'll start on
>this would be a REALLY easy node to write...maybe your first?
>(see how 'ng_tee' works and ng_one2many, and
>write one that does something in between.
I was thinking adding an algorithm to one2many.
DocWilco
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freeb
Archie Cobbs wrote:
>
> Rogier R. Mulhuijzen writes:
>
> > Also, a quick question for you netgraph guys. Why is it that ng_one2many
> > send a packet only out of one hook? I can see use for an algorithm that
> > sends packets from the 'one' hook to all the 'many' hooks (that are up) and
> > kee
"Rogier R. Mulhuijzen" wrote:
>
> >personally I use the netgraph bridging code and I think (though I'm biased)
> >that you should look at using htat rather than the hardwired bridging
> >code that it was derived from.
>
> Now that I've read up on it I can tell you you and and Archie have every
>
Hi,
> > But from my list of wishes I'd say the first 3 are gone. All that's left
is
> > spanning tree. I'm probably going to need this pretty soon, so once more
> > I'm asking if anyone is working on it. If not I'll start on it.
>
> Do you have references for how to do this? As I understand it, t
Rogier R. Mulhuijzen writes:
> Quick question for the netgraph guru's. I haven't looked yet, but is there
> an explanation of the NG_ macros I see used in the netgraph nodes' code?
Yes, but it's not documented :) Actually the daemonnews article does
document these somewhat.
The main ones are NG
Rogier R. Mulhuijzen writes:
> But from my list of wishes I'd say the first 3 are gone. All that's left is
> spanning tree. I'm probably going to need this pretty soon, so once more
> I'm asking if anyone is working on it. If not I'll start on it.
Do you have references for how to do this? As I
>
> Since I currently have high workload, I dont have time to port it to 4.x or
> 5-CURRENT...
> Conclusion: volunteer required for this work... and I can consult him/her.
Shouldn't be too hard. I'll gladly volunteer for this project.
Quick question for the netgraph guru's. I haven't looked
On Wed, 24 Jan 2001, Julian Elischer wrote:
...
> > my dc cards. No problems so far - as long as I don't use DUMMYNET with it.
> > I really wish I could use DUMMYNET as I need to put bandwidth limits on a
> > few of the computers on my network.
...
> Rate limitting is one thing that isn't t
>personally I use the netgraph bridging code and I think (though I'm biased)
>that you should look at using htat rather than the hardwired bridging
>code that it was derived from.
Now that I've read up on it I can tell you you and and Archie have every
right to be biased =)
I've had a netgraph
On Wed, 24 Jan 2001, Archie Cobbs wrote:
> Julian Elischer writes:
> > > Is there any reasonable documentation or a HOWTO on the usage of netgraph?
> > > I am currently using the standard bridging code and IPFIREWALL (ipfw) with
> > > my dc cards. No problems so far - as long as I don't use DUMM
Julian Elischer writes:
> > Is there any reasonable documentation or a HOWTO on the usage of netgraph?
> > I am currently using the standard bridging code and IPFIREWALL (ipfw) with
> > my dc cards. No problems so far - as long as I don't use DUMMYNET with it.
> > I really wish I could use DUMMYN
"Thomas T. Veldhouse" wrote:
>
> > Have a look at what you can do with netgraph first.
> >
> > Most people don't know what it is but it allows almost arbitrarily
> > complicated network topologies to be set up from the command line.
> >
> >
>
> Is there any reasonable documentation or a HOWTO on
> Have a look at what you can do with netgraph first.
>
> Most people don't know what it is but it allows almost arbitrarily
> complicated network topologies to be set up from the command line.
>
>
Is there any reasonable documentation or a HOWTO on the usage of netgraph?
I am currently using th
"Rogier R. Mulhuijzen" wrote:
>
> Is anyone working on the bridge code?
>
> I've got a couple of things I'd like to fix in it, but I wouldn't want to
> be doing anything someone else already did.
>
> My wishlist:
> 1) Better interaction with various drivers (like if_tap). For some reason I
> ne
Is anyone working on the bridge code?
I've got a couple of things I'd like to fix in it, but I wouldn't want to
be doing anything someone else already did.
My wishlist:
1) Better interaction with various drivers (like if_tap). For some reason I
need to do a wack (undocumented) sysctl to make t
24 matches
Mail list logo