Re: stat(1) isn't honouring locale

2021-10-30 Thread Stefan Esser
Am 30.10.21 um 14:12 schrieb Jamie Landeg-Jones:> Stefan Esser wrote: > >>> % date +%+ >>> Fri 29 Oct 2021 00:15:05 BST >>> >>> % stat -t%+ -f '%Sm' . >>> Fri Oct 29 00:13:38 BST 2021 >>> - > >> thank you for reporting this issue and suggesting a fix. >> >> I have comm

Re: stat(1) isn't honouring locale

2021-10-30 Thread Jamie Landeg-Jones
Stefan Esser wrote: > > % date +%+ > > Fri 29 Oct 2021 00:15:05 BST > > > > % stat -t%+ -f '%Sm' . > > Fri Oct 29 00:13:38 BST 2021 > > - > thank you for reporting this issue and suggesting a fix. > > I have committed your proposed fix to -CURRENT as Git commit 20f83

Re: stat(1) isn't honouring locale

2021-10-30 Thread Stefan Esser
Am 29.10.21 um 20:15 schrieb Jamie Landeg-Jones: > stat(1) isn't honouring locale. > > The manual page says: > > -t timefmt > Display timestamps using the specified format. This format > is passed directly to strftime(3). > > strftime(3)

stat(1) isn't honouring locale

2021-10-29 Thread Jamie Landeg-Jones
stat(1) isn't honouring locale. The manual page says: -t timefmt Display timestamps using the specified format. This format is passed directly to strftime(3). strftime(3) says: %+is replaced by national representation of the date and time (the format is si