On Sat, Sep 14, 2019 at 06:17:25PM -0700, Don Lewis wrote:
> On 13 Sep, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 05:42:00PM -0700, Don Lewis wrote:
> >> On 12 Sep, Mark Johnston wrote:
> >> > On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 04:00:17PM -0700, Don Lewis wrote:
> >> >> My poudriere machine is ru
On Sun, Sep 15, 2019, 3:17 AM Don Lewis wrote:
> On 13 Sep, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 05:42:00PM -0700, Don Lewis wrote:
> >> On 12 Sep, Mark Johnston wrote:
> >> > On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 04:00:17PM -0700, Don Lewis wrote:
> >> >> My poudriere machine is running 13.0
On 13 Sep, Mark Millard wrote:
> Don Lewis truckman at FreeBSD.org wrote on
> Thu Sep 12 23:00:19 UTC 2019 :
>
> . . .
>> Nevertheless, I see these errors,
>> with rustc being the usual victim:
>>
>> Sep 11 23:21:43 zipper kernel: pid 16581 (rustc), jid 43, uid 65534, was
>> killed: out of swap
On 13 Sep, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 05:42:00PM -0700, Don Lewis wrote:
>> On 12 Sep, Mark Johnston wrote:
>> > On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 04:00:17PM -0700, Don Lewis wrote:
>> >> My poudriere machine is running 13.0-CURRENT and gets updated to the
>> >> latest version of -C
Konstantin Belousov kostikbel at gmail.com wrote on
Fri Sep 13 05:53:41 UTC 2019 :
> Basically, page fault handler waits for vm.pfault_oom_wait *
> vm.pfault_oom_attempts for a page allocation before killing the process.
> Default is 30 secs, and if you cannot get a page for 30 secs, there is
> so
On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 10:59:58PM -0700, Mark Millard wrote:
> bob prohaska fbsd at www.zefox.net wrote on
> Fri Sep 13 16:24:57 UTC 2019 :
>
> > Not sure this is relevant, but in compiling chromium on a Pi3 with 6 GB
> > of swap the job completed successfully some months ago, with peak swap
> >
Don Lewis truckman at FreeBSD.org wrote on
Thu Sep 12 23:00:19 UTC 2019 :
. . .
> Nevertheless, I see these errors,
> with rustc being the usual victim:
>
> Sep 11 23:21:43 zipper kernel: pid 16581 (rustc), jid 43, uid 65534, was
> killed: out of swap space
> Sep 12 02:48:23 zipper kernel: pid 1
bob prohaska fbsd at www.zefox.net wrote on
Fri Sep 13 16:24:57 UTC 2019 :
> Not sure this is relevant, but in compiling chromium on a Pi3 with 6 GB
> of swap the job completed successfully some months ago, with peak swap
> use around 3.5 GB. The swap layout was sub-optimal, with a 2 GB partition
On 12 Sep, Don Lewis wrote:
> On 12 Sep, Mark Johnston wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 04:00:17PM -0700, Don Lewis wrote:
>>> My poudriere machine is running 13.0-CURRENT and gets updated to the
>>> latest version of -CURRENT periodically. At least in the last week or
>>> so, I've been seeing oc
Not sure this is relevant, but in compiling chromium on a Pi3 with 6 GB
of swap the job completed successfully some months ago, with peak swap
use around 3.5 GB. The swap layout was sub-optimal, with a 2 GB partition
combined with a 4 GB partition. A little over 4GB total seems usable.
A few day
On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 05:42:00PM -0700, Don Lewis wrote:
> On 12 Sep, Mark Johnston wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 04:00:17PM -0700, Don Lewis wrote:
> >> My poudriere machine is running 13.0-CURRENT and gets updated to the
> >> latest version of -CURRENT periodically. At least in the last w
On 12 Sep, Mark Johnston wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 04:00:17PM -0700, Don Lewis wrote:
>> My poudriere machine is running 13.0-CURRENT and gets updated to the
>> latest version of -CURRENT periodically. At least in the last week or
>> so, I've been seeing occasional port build failures when
On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 04:00:17PM -0700, Don Lewis wrote:
> My poudriere machine is running 13.0-CURRENT and gets updated to the
> latest version of -CURRENT periodically. At least in the last week or
> so, I've been seeing occasional port build failures when building my
> default set of ports, a
My poudriere machine is running 13.0-CURRENT and gets updated to the
latest version of -CURRENT periodically. At least in the last week or
so, I've been seeing occasional port build failures when building my
default set of ports, and I finally had some time to do some
investigation.
It's a 16-thr
14 matches
Mail list logo
