In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bruce Evans writes:
>On Thu, 2 Jan 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bruce Evans writes:
>> >
>> >The md driver doesn't set any of the si_ size parameters so it has no chance
>> >of getting this stuff right when the parameters are not
On Thu, 2 Jan 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bruce Evans writes:
> >
> >The md driver doesn't set any of the si_ size parameters so it has no chance
> >of getting this stuff right when the parameters are not the defaults.
>
> It does however set its sectorsize to 4
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bruce Evans writes:
>
>The md driver doesn't set any of the si_ size parameters so it has no chance
>of getting this stuff right when the parameters are not the defaults.
It does however set its sectorsize to 4k. The problem was GEOM not
setting si_bsize_phys on t
I was finally able to reproduce this. Here are some offset values:
Dec 30 10:55:07 lizzy kernel: spec_getpages:(md0) I/O read failure: (error=22) b
p 0xce5fb488 vp 0xc41e4708
Dec 30 10:55:07 lizzy kernel: size: 6144, resid: 6144, a_count: 6124, valid: 0x0
Dec 30 10:55:07 lizzy kernel: nread: 0, re
On Sun, Dec 29, 2002 at 03:57:49PM +1100, Bruce Evans wrote:
> Errors caused by these bugs can be non-deterministic because the pages may
> be loaded into memory other means. E.g., when exec off zip drives
> was broken, exec would succeed after several attempts because each attempt
> loaded anothe
On Sat, 28 Dec 2002, Jos Backus wrote:
> I am using the following fstab entry:
>
> /dev/md0 /tmp mfs rw,nosuid,nodev,-s=32m 0 0
>
> And three times now have I seen this during an installworld, both on a UP and
> an SMP system running a very recent -current:
>
> ===> usr.sbin/pcvt/ispcvt
>
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jos Backus writes:
>On Sat, Dec 28, 2002 at 08:39:32PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> 22 is EINVAL, so likely cause is a bogus offset. Either unaligned or
>> out of range. Unfortunately the above messages does not contain the
>> offset of the I/O operation.
>>
On Sat, Dec 28, 2002 at 08:39:32PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 22 is EINVAL, so likely cause is a bogus offset. Either unaligned or
> out of range. Unfortunately the above messages does not contain the
> offset of the I/O operation.
>
> Suggest you ammend one or more of the relevant printf
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jos Backus writes:
>Accompanied by
>
>Dec 28 01:42:12 lizzy kernel: spec_getpages:(md0) I/O read failure: (error=22) bp
>0xce5f9310 vp 0xc41e8708
>Dec 28 01:42:12 lizzy kernel: size: 2048, resid: 2048, a_count: 2028, valid: 0x0
>Dec 28 01:42:12 lizzy ke
I am using the following fstab entry:
/dev/md0 /tmp mfs rw,nosuid,nodev,-s=32m 0 0
And three times now have I seen this during an installworld, both on a UP and
an SMP system running a very recent -current:
===> usr.sbin/pcvt/ispcvt
install -s -o root -g wheel -m 555 ispcvt /usr/sb
10 matches
Mail list logo