On Tue Oct 18 11, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 17/10/2011 23:01 Alexander Best said the following:
> > hi there,
> >
> > any thoughts regarding this change? with the ata subsystem dying, linking to
> > /dev/acd isn't really necessary any more. also a lot of ports nowadays
> > depend
> > on /dev/dvd.
on 17/10/2011 23:01 Alexander Best said the following:
> hi there,
>
> any thoughts regarding this change? with the ata subsystem dying, linking to
> /dev/acd isn't really necessary any more. also a lot of ports nowadays depend
> on /dev/dvd.
IMO, go for it.
--
Andriy Gapon
hi there,
any thoughts regarding this change? with the ata subsystem dying, linking to
/dev/acd isn't really necessary any more. also a lot of ports nowadays depend
on /dev/dvd.
cheers.
alex
diff --git a/etc/devfs.conf b/etc/devfs.conf
index f7869fe..f3a270e 100644
--- a/etc/devfs.conf
+++ b/etc/
