Eric van Gyzen wrote:
> On 11/06/2014 12:30, Fabian Keil wrote:
> > Eric van Gyzen wrote:
> >
> >> In sh, if I use a single statement to declare a local variable and
> >> assign the output of a command to it, the exit status of that command is
> >> lost. For example:
> >>
> >> should_return
Eric van Gyzen wrote:
> In sh, if I use a single statement to declare a local variable and
> assign the output of a command to it, the exit status of that command is
> lost. For example:
>
> should_return_false() {
> local var1=`false`
> }
>
> The function should return non-zer
On 11/06/2014 12:30, Fabian Keil wrote:
> Eric van Gyzen wrote:
>
>> In sh, if I use a single statement to declare a local variable and
>> assign the output of a command to it, the exit status of that command is
>> lost. For example:
>>
>> should_return_false() {
>> local var1=`false`
Jilles and -current:
In sh, if I use a single statement to declare a local variable and
assign the output of a command to it, the exit status of that command is
lost. For example:
should_return_false() {
local var1=`false`
}
The function should return non-zero, but it returns ze
