On Wed, Feb 14, 2001 at 12:26:39AM +0900, Akinori MUSHA wrote:
> At Tue, 13 Feb 2001 20:01:28 +0600 (NOVT),
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Yes this patch permits 'setlocale(LC_ALL, "")' to return
> > success, but it is not solve the problem totally. It seems to me
> > that all comparisons of t
hi,
Yep! You was completely correct, I made mistake in mostly cosmetics "style(9)"
commit :-( Thanks for spoting that!
BTW, problem should be fixed as side effect of my commit made some time
ago related to __part_load_locale() interface change. Check it please.
On Wed, Feb 14, 2001 at 12:26:39A
At Tue, 13 Feb 2001 20:01:28 +0600 (NOVT),
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Yes this patch permits 'setlocale(LC_ALL, "")' to return
> success, but it is not solve the problem totally. It seems to me
> that all comparisons of the return value from '__part_load_locale'
> in the 'lmessages.c', 'lnum
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> At Tue, 13 Feb 2001 07:21:15 +0900,
> I wrote:
>> I found that setlocale() always fails on -current.
.
>> Any ideas?
>
> I found the culprit. Here is a patch which fixes the problem.
Yes this patch permits 'setlocale(LC_ALL, "")
Hi again,
At Tue, 13 Feb 2001 07:21:15 +0900,
I wrote:
> I found that setlocale() always fails on -current.
>
> #include
> #include
>
> int main()
> {
> if (setlocale(LC_ALL, ""))
> puts("ok");
> else
> puts("failed");
> return 0;
> }
>
> This program shows "failed" on -current
