In message <20220828130107.1a76d54a.gre...@freebsd.org>, Michael Gmelin
writes:
>
>
>
> On Sun, 28 Aug 2022 03:21:24 -0700
> Cy Schubert wrote:
>
> > In message <16b4-76a1-4e46-b7c3-60492d379...@freebsd.org>,
> > Michael Gmelin w
> > rites:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > On 28. Aug 2022, at 10
On Sun, 28 Aug 2022 03:21:24 -0700
Cy Schubert wrote:
> In message <16b4-76a1-4e46-b7c3-60492d379...@freebsd.org>,
> Michael Gmelin w
> rites:
> >
> >
> >
> > > On 28. Aug 2022, at 10:42, free...@oldach.net wrote:
> > >=20
> > > =EF=BB=BFCy Schubert wrote on Sat, 27 Aug 2022 17:26:38 +0
In message <16b4-76a1-4e46-b7c3-60492d379...@freebsd.org>, Michael
Gmelin w
rites:
>
>
>
> > On 28. Aug 2022, at 10:42, free...@oldach.net wrote:
> >=20
> > =EF=BB=BFCy Schubert wrote on Sat, 27 Aug 2022 17:26:38 +0200 (CEST):
> >> As stated before in this thread, replacing /var/run with tmpf
In message <202208280842.27s8gdxn055...@nuc.oldach.net>, Helge Oldach
writes:
> Cy Schubert wrote on Sat, 27 Aug 2022 17:26:38 +0200 (CEST):
> > As stated before in this thread, replacing /var/run with tmpfs is not a
> > supported configuration.
>
> Not supported? What is the purpose of /etc/rc.d/
On Sun, 28 Aug 2022 11:37:16 +0200
Michael Gmelin wrote:
> > On 28. Aug 2022, at 10:42, free...@oldach.net wrote:
> >
> > Cy Schubert wrote on Sat, 27 Aug 2022 17:26:38 +0200 (CEST):
> >> As stated before in this thread, replacing /var/run with tmpfs is
> >> not a supported configuration.
>
> On 28. Aug 2022, at 10:42, free...@oldach.net wrote:
>
> Cy Schubert wrote on Sat, 27 Aug 2022 17:26:38 +0200 (CEST):
>> As stated before in this thread, replacing /var/run with tmpfs is not a
>> supported configuration.
>
> Not supported? What is the purpose of /etc/rc.d/var then? That cre
In message <20220827082638.57901a72@slippy>, Cy Schubert writes:
> On Sat, 27 Aug 2022 15:38:44 +0200
> Juraj Lutter wrote:
>
> > > On 27 Aug 2022, at 15:27, Michael Gmelin wrote:
> > >=20
> > >=20
> > > =20
> > >> On 27. Aug 2022, at 15:18, free...@oldach.net wrote:
> > >>=20
> > >> =EF=BB=BFMi
On Sat, 27 Aug 2022 15:38:44 +0200
Juraj Lutter wrote:
> > On 27 Aug 2022, at 15:27, Michael Gmelin wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >> On 27. Aug 2022, at 15:18, free...@oldach.net wrote:
> >>
> >> Michael Gmelin wrote on Sat, 27 Aug 2022 15:02:04 +0200 (CEST):
> >>> (you're removing /var/run, whi
Michael Gmelin wrote:
> I like the idea of having something like tmpfiles.d, it would also help port
> maintainers (could also be done as a port).
I use tmpfs for /var/run and already have such a script for this very reason
(although not clamav)
I would have thought each port startup script sh
> On 27 Aug 2022, at 15:27, Michael Gmelin wrote:
>
>
>
>> On 27. Aug 2022, at 15:18, free...@oldach.net wrote:
>>
>> Michael Gmelin wrote on Sat, 27 Aug 2022 15:02:04 +0200 (CEST):
>>> (you're removing /var/run, which shouldn't be removed
>>
>> Not quite. It's actually not uncommon to boo
> On 27. Aug 2022, at 15:18, free...@oldach.net wrote:
>
> Michael Gmelin wrote on Sat, 27 Aug 2022 15:02:04 +0200 (CEST):
>> (you're removing /var/run, which shouldn't be removed
>
> Not quite. It's actually not uncommon to boot with an empty /var. Please see
> /etc/rc.d/var and related.
T
Am Sat, 27 Aug 2022 13:16:43 +0200
tue...@freebsd.org schrieb:
> > On 27. Aug 2022, at 08:30, FreeBSD User wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm referencing to Bug 259699 [2] and Bug 259585 [1].
> >
> > Port security/clamav is without doubt for many of FreeBSD users an
> > important piece of
> >
> On 27. Aug 2022, at 12:54, FreeBSD User wrote:
>
> Am Sat, 27 Aug 2022 11:21:40 +0200
> Michael Gmelin schrieb:
>
On 27. Aug 2022, at 08:31, FreeBSD User wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I'm referencing to Bug 259699 [2] and Bug 259585 [1].
>>>
>>> Port security/clamav is without d
> On 27. Aug 2022, at 08:30, FreeBSD User wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm referencing to Bug 259699 [2] and Bug 259585 [1].
>
> Port security/clamav is without doubt for many of FreeBSD users an important
> piece of security
> software so I assume a widespread usage.
>
> It is also a not uncommon u
Am Sat, 27 Aug 2022 11:21:40 +0200
Michael Gmelin schrieb:
> > On 27. Aug 2022, at 08:31, FreeBSD User wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm referencing to Bug 259699 [2] and Bug 259585 [1].
> >
> > Port security/clamav is without doubt for many of FreeBSD users an
> > important piece of
> > se
> On 27. Aug 2022, at 08:31, FreeBSD User wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm referencing to Bug 259699 [2] and Bug 259585 [1].
>
> Port security/clamav is without doubt for many of FreeBSD users an important
> piece of security
> software so I assume a widespread usage.
>
> It is also a not uncomm
Hello,
Maybe you can use a shell script that creates the directory with @reboot at
cron. If this doesn't work (not sure if clamav starts before cron), then maybe
you can use monit to create the directory and start clamav.
Kind regards,
Christos Chatzaras
> On 27 Aug 2022, at 09:30, FreeBSD Use
Hello,
I'm referencing to Bug 259699 [2] and Bug 259585 [1].
Port security/clamav is without doubt for many of FreeBSD users an important
piece of security
software so I assume a widespread usage.
It is also a not uncommon use case to use NanoBSD or any kind of
low-memory-footprint
installatio
18 matches
Mail list logo
