on 22/11/2010 16:30 John Baldwin said the following:
> No. Especially since the structure is private it can always be revived if a
> use is found for it. You can probably leave the taskqueue_create() API the
> same for now though.
>
OK. Committed.
Thank you!
--
Andriy Gapon
__
On Saturday, November 20, 2010 5:00:34 am Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 19/11/2010 18:58 John Baldwin said the following:
> > On Friday, November 19, 2010 11:20:04 am Andriy Gapon wrote:
> >> BTW, tq_name doesn't seem to be used anywhere at all.
> >> Perhaps just drop it? But still could be useful in a
on 19/11/2010 18:58 John Baldwin said the following:
> On Friday, November 19, 2010 11:20:04 am Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> BTW, tq_name doesn't seem to be used anywhere at all.
>> Perhaps just drop it? But still could be useful in a debugger, though.
>
> If it's not used anywhere I would just drop it
