On 2017-Feb-14 10:32:32 -0800, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> After some discussion on svn mailing list [1], there is intention
>to remove SVR4 binary compatibilty layer from FreeBSD head, meaning
>that FreeBSD 12.0-RELEASE, available in couple of years would
>be shipped without it. There is no intention
Well, I'd like to offer help keeping it (because on a personal
opinion, I'd like being compatible `:-D).
But the reasons are pretty reasonable and convincing :-).
I have no more objections against removing it when security risks involves.
--
Best wishes, MMokhi.
___
In message <20170215081430.gc58...@freebsd.org>, Gleb Smirnoff writes:
>Well, we all "maintain" it, meaning that we keep it compilable. However,
>I'm sure that no one checks the functionality. There are no regression
>tests, and seems to be no users.
And probably nobody ever bothered to
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 10:56:29AM +0330, mokhi wrote:
m> Is this removing is because no-interest on maintaining it?
m>
m> If it helps, I am working to use the `kern_* instead sys_*` as
m> mentioned patch in that discussion suggests for svr4, if this helps.
Well, we all "maintain" it, meaning tha
Hi,
Is this removing is because no-interest on maintaining it?
If it helps, I am working to use the `kern_* instead sys_*` as
mentioned patch in that discussion suggests for svr4, if this helps.
--
Best wishes, MMokhi.
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Hello!
After some discussion on svn mailing list [1], there is intention
to remove SVR4 binary compatibilty layer from FreeBSD head, meaning
that FreeBSD 12.0-RELEASE, available in couple of years would
be shipped without it. There is no intention of merge of the removal.
The stable@ mailing l