On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 01:39:28PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 09:12:50AM +0200, Stefan Farfeleder wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 11:27:55PM +0200, Stefan Farfeleder wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 03:53:38PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > > > On Wed,
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 09:12:50AM +0200, Stefan Farfeleder wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 11:27:55PM +0200, Stefan Farfeleder wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 03:53:38PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 01:34:01PM +0200, Stefan Farfeleder wrote:
> > > > On Tue, A
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 11:27:55PM +0200, Stefan Farfeleder wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 03:53:38PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 01:34:01PM +0200, Stefan Farfeleder wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 08:31:53AM +0200, Stefan Farfeleder wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
I'm glad to report that your patch fixes not only wlock-within-wlock cases
but also rlock-within-wlock cases properly!
On Wed, 11 Apr 2012 22:42:39 +0300
Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 04:04:11AM +0900, Taku YAMAMOTO wrote:
(snip)
> > The following is the first occurence o
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 03:53:38PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 01:34:01PM +0200, Stefan Farfeleder wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 08:31:53AM +0200, Stefan Farfeleder wrote:
> > >
> > > I'm experiencing that too (r234038), xine also no longer starts (hangs
> > >
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 04:04:11AM +0900, Taku YAMAMOTO wrote:
> The following is the first occurence of wlock-within-wlock incident
> when I run xfdesktop-settings under gdb.
>
> Hardware watchpoint 3: lock_place[0].count_ww
>
> Old value = 0
> New value = 1
> 0x28f52522 in _thr_rtld_wlock_acqui
The following is the first occurence of wlock-within-wlock incident
when I run xfdesktop-settings under gdb.
Hardware watchpoint 3: lock_place[0].count_ww
Old value = 0
New value = 1
0x28f52522 in _thr_rtld_wlock_acquire (lock=0x28f63600)
at /usr/src/lib/libthr/thread/thr_rtld.c:152
152
On Wed, 11 Apr 2012 15:53:38 +0300
Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 01:34:01PM +0200, Stefan Farfeleder wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 08:31:53AM +0200, Stefan Farfeleder wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 01:44:02AM -0400, AN wrote:
> > > > FreeBSD FBSD10 10.0-CURRENT F
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 01:34:01PM +0200, Stefan Farfeleder wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 08:31:53AM +0200, Stefan Farfeleder wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 01:44:02AM -0400, AN wrote:
> > > FreeBSD FBSD10 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #7 r234042: Sun Apr 8
> > > 17:36:38 EDT 2012
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 08:31:53AM +0200, Stefan Farfeleder wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 01:44:02AM -0400, AN wrote:
> > FreeBSD FBSD10 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #7 r234042: Sun Apr 8
> > 17:36:38 EDT 2012 root@FBSD10:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/MYKERNEL amd64
> >
> > After a recent up
On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 08:31:53 +0200
Stefan Farfeleder wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 01:44:02AM -0400, AN wrote:
> > FreeBSD FBSD10 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #7 r234042: Sun
> > Apr 8 17:36:38 EDT 2012
> > root@FBSD10:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/MYKERNEL amd64
> >
> > After a recent update o
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 01:44:02AM -0400, AN wrote:
> FreeBSD FBSD10 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #7 r234042: Sun Apr 8
> 17:36:38 EDT 2012 root@FBSD10:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/MYKERNEL amd64
>
> After a recent update on Sunday to r234042 I am having a problem with 2
> ports:
>
> gedit
>
FreeBSD FBSD10 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #7 r234042: Sun Apr 8
17:36:38 EDT 2012 root@FBSD10:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/MYKERNEL amd64
After a recent update on Sunday to r234042 I am having a problem with 2
ports:
gedit
evince
(using Gnome2 - ports tree up to date)
My last update (be
13 matches
Mail list logo