Re: reading kernel dump - post gcc 3.1

2002-06-03 Thread Georg-W. Koltermann
Am Mo, 2002-05-27 um 19.52 schrieb David O'Brien: > On Mon, May 27, 2002 at 12:23:13PM +0200, Georg-W. Koltermann wrote: > > Please read bin/38236. I wasn't asking for general directions but for a > > specific solution to a current -current problem. > > RTFM specifically the "-gstabs+" GCC optio

Re: reading kernel dump - post gcc 3.1

2002-05-27 Thread David O'Brien
On Mon, May 27, 2002 at 12:23:13PM +0200, Georg-W. Koltermann wrote: > Please read bin/38236. I wasn't asking for general directions but for a > specific solution to a current -current problem. RTFM specifically the "-gstabs+" GCC option. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "uns

Re: reading kernel dump - post gcc 3.1

2002-05-27 Thread Georg-W. Koltermann
Am Sa, 2002-05-25 um 02.30 schrieb Craig Carey: > [...] > savecore(8) should copy a dump of the crashed kernel to /var/crash and > created files kernel.0 and vmcore.0. > > gdb -k kernel.0 vmcore.0 > hunter[13]$ gdb -k kernel.debug vmcore.19 GNU gdb 4.18 (FreeBSD) Copyright 1998 Free

Re: reading kernel dump - post gcc 3.1

2002-05-24 Thread Craig Carey
At 02\05\24 14:52 +0200 Friday, Georg-W. Koltermann wrote: >Hi, > >I got a couple of kernel panics recently, some of them "buffer not >locked". I would like to know how I can get more information out of the >dump. > >The system's gdb does not like the dump format any more, see also >bin/38

reading kernel dump - post gcc 3.1

2002-05-24 Thread Georg-W. Koltermann
Hi, I got a couple of kernel panics recently, some of them "buffer not locked". I would like to know how I can get more information out of the dump. The system's gdb does not like the dump format any more, see also bin/38236. There is an advertised workaround in that pr of using gdb52, but I co