On 06/29/17 13:16, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
On 06/26/17 15:03, O. Hartmann wrote:
On Mon, 26 Jun 2017 14:48:58 +0200
Gary Jennejohn wrote:
On Mon, 26 Jun 2017 14:00:48 +0200
"O. Hartmann" wrote:
On Mon, 26 Jun 2017 13:26:08 +0200
Gary Jennejohn wrote:
On Mon, 26 Jun 2017 10:29:47 +0200
On 06/26/17 15:03, O. Hartmann wrote:
On Mon, 26 Jun 2017 14:48:58 +0200
Gary Jennejohn wrote:
On Mon, 26 Jun 2017 14:00:48 +0200
"O. Hartmann" wrote:
On Mon, 26 Jun 2017 13:26:08 +0200
Gary Jennejohn wrote:
On Mon, 26 Jun 2017 10:29:47 +0200
"O. Hartmann" wrote:
Over the past
On Mon, 26 Jun 2017 12:22:50 +0100
Steven Hartland wrote:
> Is this related to kib's additional fix over the weekend?
>
> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/320344
>
> Regards
> Steve
>
> On 26/06/2017 09:29, O. Hartmann wrote:
> > Over the past week we did not update several
On Mon, 26 Jun 2017 14:48:58 +0200
Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Jun 2017 14:00:48 +0200
> "O. Hartmann" wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 26 Jun 2017 13:26:08 +0200
> > Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, 26 Jun 2017 10:29:47 +0200
> > > "O. Hartmann" wrote:
> > >
> > > > Over the past w
On Mon, 26 Jun 2017 14:00:48 +0200
"O. Hartmann" wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Jun 2017 13:26:08 +0200
> Gary Jennejohn wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 26 Jun 2017 10:29:47 +0200
> > "O. Hartmann" wrote:
> >
> > > Over the past week we did not update several 12-CURRENT running
> > > development
> > > hosts, so
On Mon, 26 Jun 2017 13:26:08 +0200
Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Jun 2017 10:29:47 +0200
> "O. Hartmann" wrote:
>
> > Over the past week we did not update several 12-CURRENT running development
> > hosts, so today is the first day of performing this task.
> >
> > First I hit the very same
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 10:29:47AM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
> Over the past week we did not update several 12-CURRENT running development
> hosts, so today is the first day of performing this task.
>
> First I hit the very same problem David Wolfskill reported earlier, a fatal
> trap 12, but fowl
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 10:29:47AM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
> ...
> Since tag 20170617 in /usr/src/UPDATING referred to the INO64 update and the
> INO64 update hasn't performed so far starting from r319971, I installed the
> kernel, rebooted the box in single user mode (this time smoothly), did a
On Mon, 26 Jun 2017 12:22+0100, Steven Hartland wrote:
> Is this related to kib's additional fix over the weekend?
>
> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/320344
Attempting to run r320348 with no patches applied proved unfruitful earlier
today.
I had partial success the weekend building
On Mon, 26 Jun 2017 10:29:47 +0200
"O. Hartmann" wrote:
> Over the past week we did not update several 12-CURRENT running development
> hosts, so today is the first day of performing this task.
>
> First I hit the very same problem David Wolfskill reported earlier, a fatal
> trap 12, but fowllow
Is this related to kib's additional fix over the weekend?
https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/320344
Regards
Steve
On 26/06/2017 09:29, O. Hartmann wrote:
Over the past week we did not update several 12-CURRENT running development
hosts, so today is the first day of performing th
Over the past week we did not update several 12-CURRENT running development
hosts, so today is the first day of performing this task.
First I hit the very same problem David Wolfskill reported earlier, a fatal
trap 12, but fowllowing the thread, I did as advised: removing /usr/obj
completely (we u
12 matches
Mail list logo