On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 10:14:29PM -0500, Rick Macklem wrote:
> Good work. This patch seems to have done the trick. I've run
> quite a few kernel build cycles without a hang. I'll keep running
> them, but I would have expected to see a hang by now.
>
> Maybe Tim can test the patch as well?
> (I ne
Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 10:01:39PM -0500, Rick Macklem wrote:
> > Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > > On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 08:58:47PM -0500, Rick Macklem wrote:
> > > > Ok, I'll test r243598 and then r243599 and r243835, just to
> > > > see if it really is this.
> > > >
Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 10:01:39PM -0500, Rick Macklem wrote:
> > Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > > On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 08:58:47PM -0500, Rick Macklem wrote:
> > > > Ok, I'll test r243598 and then r243599 and r243835, just to
> > > > see if it really is this.
> > > >
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 10:01:39PM -0500, Rick Macklem wrote:
> Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 08:58:47PM -0500, Rick Macklem wrote:
> > > Ok, I'll test r243598 and then r243599 and r243835, just to
> > > see if it really is this.
> > >
> > > I'll email when I have done this
Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 08:58:47PM -0500, Rick Macklem wrote:
> > Ok, I'll test r243598 and then r243599 and r243835, just to
> > see if it really is this.
> >
> > I'll email when I have done this.
> If you test only r243598, I am sure that you would experience
> corrup
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 08:58:47PM -0500, Rick Macklem wrote:
> Ok, I'll test r243598 and then r243599 and r243835, just to
> see if it really is this.
>
> I'll email when I have done this.
If you test only r243598, I am sure that you would experience corruption.
The r243599 should cause the deadl
Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 05:30:24PM -0500, Rick Macklem wrote:
> > Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > > On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 04:55:52PM -0500, Rick Macklem wrote:
> > > > Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 07:11:59PM -0500, Rick Macklem wrote:
>
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 05:30:24PM -0500, Rick Macklem wrote:
> Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 04:55:52PM -0500, Rick Macklem wrote:
> > > Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 07:11:59PM -0500, Rick Macklem wrote:
> > > > > Konstantin Belousov wrote:
>
Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 04:55:52PM -0500, Rick Macklem wrote:
> > Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > > On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 07:11:59PM -0500, Rick Macklem wrote:
> > > > Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 01:38:21PM -0500, Rick Macklem wrote:
>
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 04:55:52PM -0500, Rick Macklem wrote:
> Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 07:11:59PM -0500, Rick Macklem wrote:
> > > Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 01:38:21PM -0500, Rick Macklem wrote:
> > > > > Adrian Chadd wrote:
> > > > >
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 9:55 PM, Rick Macklem wrote:
> Konstantin Belousov wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 07:11:59PM -0500, Rick Macklem wrote:
>> > Konstantin Belousov wrote:
>> > > On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 01:38:21PM -0500, Rick Macklem wrote:
>> > > > Adrian Chadd wrote:
>> > > > > .. what wa
Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 07:11:59PM -0500, Rick Macklem wrote:
> > Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > > On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 01:38:21PM -0500, Rick Macklem wrote:
> > > > Adrian Chadd wrote:
> > > > > .. what was the previous kernel version?
> > > > >
> > > > Hopefully Ti
On Dec 10, 2012, at 10:38 AM, Rick Macklem wrote:
> Adrian Chadd wrote:
>> .. what was the previous kernel version?
>>
> Hopefully Tim has it narrowed down more, but I don't see
> the hangs on a Sept. 7 kernel from head and I do see them
> on a Dec. 3 kernel from head. (Don't know the eact r
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 07:11:59PM -0500, Rick Macklem wrote:
> Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 01:38:21PM -0500, Rick Macklem wrote:
> > > Adrian Chadd wrote:
> > > > .. what was the previous kernel version?
> > > >
> > > Hopefully Tim has it narrowed down more, but I don't
Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 01:38:21PM -0500, Rick Macklem wrote:
> > Adrian Chadd wrote:
> > > .. what was the previous kernel version?
> > >
> > Hopefully Tim has it narrowed down more, but I don't see
> > the hangs on a Sept. 7 kernel from head and I do see them
> > on a
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 01:38:21PM -0500, Rick Macklem wrote:
> Adrian Chadd wrote:
> > .. what was the previous kernel version?
> >
> Hopefully Tim has it narrowed down more, but I don't see
> the hangs on a Sept. 7 kernel from head and I do see them
> on a Dec. 3 kernel from head. (Don't know th
Adrian Chadd wrote:
> .. what was the previous kernel version?
>
Hopefully Tim has it narrowed down more, but I don't see
the hangs on a Sept. 7 kernel from head and I do see them
on a Dec. 3 kernel from head. (Don't know the eact rNN.)
It seems to predate my commit (r244008), which was my fi
.. what was the previous kernel version?
adrian
On 9 December 2012 22:08, Tim Kientzle wrote:
> I haven't found any useful clues yet, but thought I'd ask if anyone else
> was seeing hangs in a recent kernel.
>
> I just upgraded to r244036 using a straight GENERIC i386 kernel.
> (Straight buil
I haven't found any useful clues yet, but thought I'd ask if anyone else
was seeing hangs in a recent kernel.
I just upgraded to r244036 using a straight GENERIC i386 kernel.
(Straight buildworld/buildkernel, no local changes, /etc/src.conf doesn't
exist, /etc/make.conf just has PERL_VERSION defin
19 matches
Mail list logo
