On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 1:35 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Attempt #2:
>
> http://people.freebsd.org/~adrian/netflix/20130816-hwpmc-sbx-1.diff
>
Looks good. You should update the manpage for sbx too and add new counters.
>
> I've verified that I get counter events from this! But I need to load up a
Attempt #2:
http://people.freebsd.org/~adrian/netflix/20130816-hwpmc-sbx-1.diff
I've verified that I get counter events from this! But I need to load up a
system more to trigger contention to validate that they're doing the right
thing.
Unfortunately there's an erratum on this which we need to a
2013/8/14 Davide Italiano :
> On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 10:58 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This (and maybe more?) events are applicable to both the sandy bridge and
>> sandy bridge xeon CPUs.
>>
>> This is from the Intel SDM June 2013 Volume #3.
>>
>> David/Jim, does this look fine to you?
>
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 10:58 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This (and maybe more?) events are applicable to both the sandy bridge and
> sandy bridge xeon CPUs.
>
> This is from the Intel SDM June 2013 Volume #3.
>
> David/Jim, does this look fine to you?
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> ndex: sys/dev/hwpmc/h
Hi,
This (and maybe more?) events are applicable to both the sandy bridge and
sandy bridge xeon CPUs.
This is from the Intel SDM June 2013 Volume #3.
David/Jim, does this look fine to you?
Thanks,
ndex: sys/dev/hwpmc/hwpmc_core.c
===
