On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 12:45:32PM +0100, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
| On 2015-01-20 2:05, Xin Li wrote:
| >>Doing it in 11 makes sense since there is a compat layer for 10
| >>now? if I knew all of the steps I would happily do them as annoys
| >>me from time to time as well with the path length is
On 2015-01-20 2:05, Xin Li wrote:
Doing it in 11 makes sense since there is a compat layer for 10
now… if I knew all of the steps I would happily do them as annoys
me from time to time as well with the path length issue.
Compat layer may break applications in other funny ways and we
probably ha
Xin Li wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> On 01/19/15 13:20, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> > On Jan 19, 2015, at 8:46, Brandon Allbery
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 10:44 AM, Anton Shterenlikht
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> So perhaps changing MNAMELEN will break s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 01/19/15 13:20, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Jan 19, 2015, at 8:46, Brandon Allbery
> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 10:44 AM, Anton Shterenlikht
>> wrote:
>>
>>> So perhaps changing MNAMELEN will break statfs(2) on -stable
>>> too?
>>>
>>
On 2015-01-19 16:20, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Jan 19, 2015, at 8:46, Brandon Allbery wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 10:44 AM, Anton Shterenlikht
>> wrote:
>>
>>> So perhaps changing MNAMELEN will break statfs(2) on
>>> -stable too?
>>>
>>
>> I believe the context there is not so much "-cu
On 19-1-2015 22:20, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Jan 19, 2015, at 8:46, Brandon Allbery
> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 10:44 AM, Anton Shterenlikht
>> wrote:
>>
>>> So perhaps changing MNAMELEN will break statfs(2) on -stable
>>> too?
>>>
>>
>> I believe the context there is not so much
On Jan 19, 2015, at 8:46, Brandon Allbery wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 10:44 AM, Anton Shterenlikht
> wrote:
>
>> So perhaps changing MNAMELEN will break statfs(2) on
>> -stable too?
>>
>
> I believe the context there is not so much "-current is special", as
> "changing it for everyone is
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 10:44 AM, Anton Shterenlikht
wrote:
> So perhaps changing MNAMELEN will break statfs(2) on
> -stable too?
>
I believe the context there is not so much "-current is special", as
"changing it for everyone is bad news" (and this would necessarily need to
originate in -curren
>From rmack...@uoguelph.ca Mon Jan 19 15:37:25 2015
>> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167105
>>
>> is a show stopper for me. The path/name length is
>> beyond my control, so I cannot make it shorter.
>>
>> This discussion seems inconclusive:
>> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermai
Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> This bug:
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167105
>
> is a show stopper for me. The path/name length is
> beyond my control, so I cannot make it shorter.
>
> This discussion seems inconclusive:
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/201
This bug:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167105
is a show stopper for me. The path/name length is
beyond my control, so I cannot make it shorter.
This discussion seems inconclusive:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/2012-April/038543.html
Is there no easy solu
11 matches
Mail list logo
