On 2022-05-25 at 11:49 EDT, Warner Losh wrote:
On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 9:39 AM Matteo Riondato wrote:
On 2022-05-25 at 11:29 EDT, Warner Losh wrote:
>
>SET FEATURES (opcode 9) feature 0xb is indeed async event
>configuration.
>0x31f is:
>SMART WARNING for available spares (0x1)
>SMART
On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 6:59 AM Alexander Motin wrote:
...
> > nvme0: SET FEATURES (09) sqid:0 cid:15 nsid:0 cdw10:000b cdw11:031f
> > nvme0: INVALID_FIELD (00/02) sqid:0 cid:15 cdw0:0
...
> Those messages mean that driver tried to enable certain types of
> asynchronous events, but probabl
On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 9:39 AM Matteo Riondato wrote:
> On 2022-05-25 at 11:29 EDT, Warner Losh wrote:
> >
> >SET FEATURES (opcode 9) feature 0xb is indeed async event
> >configuration.
> >0x31f is:
> >SMART WARNING for available spares (0x1)
> >SMART warning for temperature (0x2)
> >SMART WARN
Here's a patch that might fix it
diff --git a/sys/dev/nvme/nvme_ctrlr.c b/sys/dev/nvme/nvme_ctrlr.c
index 2c5d521ecaa1..72c511de3be8 100644
--- a/sys/dev/nvme/nvme_ctrlr.c
+++ b/sys/dev/nvme/nvme_ctrlr.c
@@ -854,8 +854,9 @@ nvme_ctrlr_configure_aer(struct nvme_controller *ctrlr)
NVME_C
On 2022-05-25 at 11:29 EDT, Warner Losh wrote:
SET FEATURES (opcode 9) feature 0xb is indeed async event
configuration.
0x31f is:
SMART WARNING for available spares (0x1)
SMART warning for temperature (0x2)
SMART WARNING for device reliability (0x4)
SMART WARNING for being read only (0x8)
SMA
On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 8:18 AM matti k wrote:
> On Wed, 25 May 2022 09:58:54 -0400
> Alexander Motin wrote:
>
> > On 25.05.2022 08:25, Matteo Riondato wrote:
> > > My dmesg.boot contains the following entries containing
> > > "INVALID_FIELD" about nvme (I use nda(4) for my nvme disks, with
> >
> On May 25, 2022, at 9:58 AM, Alexander Motin wrote:
>
> On 25.05.2022 08:25, Matteo Riondato wrote:
>> My dmesg.boot contains the following entries containing "INVALID_FIELD"
>> about nvme (I use nda(4) for my nvme disks, with hw.nvme.use_nvd=0 in
>> loader.conf):
>> trismegistus ~ % grep -
On Wed, 25 May 2022 09:58:54 -0400
Alexander Motin wrote:
> On 25.05.2022 08:25, Matteo Riondato wrote:
> > My dmesg.boot contains the following entries containing
> > "INVALID_FIELD" about nvme (I use nda(4) for my nvme disks, with
> > hw.nvme.use_nvd=0 in loader.conf):
> >
> > trismegistus ~ %
On 25.05.2022 08:25, Matteo Riondato wrote:
My dmesg.boot contains the following entries containing "INVALID_FIELD"
about nvme (I use nda(4) for my nvme disks, with hw.nvme.use_nvd=0 in
loader.conf):
trismegistus ~ % grep -e 'nvme[0-9]\?' /var/run/dmesg.boot
nvme0: mem 0xb861-0xb8613fff i
On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 5:26 AM Matteo Riondato wrote:
...
> nvme0: SET FEATURES (09) sqid:0 cid:15 nsid:0 cdw10:000b
> cdw11:031f
> nvme0: INVALID_FIELD (00/02) sqid:0 cid:15 cdw0:0
...
> nda0 at nvme0 bus 0 scbus16 target 0 lun 1
> nda0: nvme version 1.2 x4 (max x4) lanes PCIe Gen3 (max
Dear list,
My dmesg.boot contains the following entries containing "INVALID_FIELD"
about nvme (I use nda(4) for my nvme disks, with hw.nvme.use_nvd=0 in
loader.conf):
trismegistus ~ % grep -e 'nvme[0-9]\?' /var/run/dmesg.boot
nvme0: mem 0xb861-0xb8613fff irq 40 at device 0.0
numa-domain
11 matches
Mail list logo