Robert Watson wrote:
> I'm guessing this relates to nroff/groff tweaks, but I was a bit unhappy to
> learn that the command I've used for the last decade to render man pages
> while
> editing them (nroff -mandoc foo.1 | more) no longer works (output below).
nroff -c -mandoc foo.1 should work
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 12:56:16PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> The proper way to do this atm is 'man ./foo.1'. I had the same set of
> commands under the fingers as well, but doing it the new way has many
> benefits. Not the least of which is that you will see the page the same
> way man will rende
The proper way to do this atm is 'man ./foo.1'. I had the same set of
commands under the fingers as well, but doing it the new way has many
benefits. Not the least of which is that you will see the page the same
way man will render it when it's installed.
Doug (change is hard)
On 8/14/2011 12:0
I also use this line for testing man page edits. It will be a very
sad thing if it's been broken in 9.0.
On 8/14/11 8:29 AM, Robert Watson wrote:
I'm guessing this relates to nroff/groff tweaks, but I was a bit
unhappy to learn that the command I've used for the last decade to
render man p
I'm guessing this relates to nroff/groff tweaks, but I was a bit unhappy to
learn that the command I've used for the last decade to render man pages while
editing them (nroff -mandoc foo.1 | more) no longer works (output below).
It seems likely this has to do with teaching groff to use ANSI e
