Re: nos-tun & multihomed machines

On Fri, Mar 16, 2001, Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai wrote: > -On [20010316 10:43], Eugene Polovnikov ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > >Please, review the following PR: > >http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=25847 > > > >Same patch is in the attach. > > Just a question, > > the gif interface now par

Re: nos-tun & multihomed machines

[-current dropped (Bcc'ed)] On Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 12:58:06PM +0100, Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai wrote: > -On [20010316 12:45], Ruslan Ermilov ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > >On Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 10:50:26AM +0100, Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai wrote: > >> -On [20010316 10:43], Eugene Polovnikov ([EMAIL PRO

Re: nos-tun & multihomed machines

-On [20010316 12:45], Ruslan Ermilov ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: >On Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 10:50:26AM +0100, Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai wrote: >> -On [20010316 10:43], Eugene Polovnikov ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: [gif versus nos-tun] >Yes, gif(4) works the same way, and multihomed enabled (see gifconf

Re: nos-tun & multihomed machines

On Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 10:50:26AM +0100, Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai wrote: > -On [20010316 10:43], Eugene Polovnikov ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Hello, Engene! Hope you are doing well! :-) > >Please, review the following PR: > >http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=25847 > > > >Same patch i

Re: nos-tun & multihomed machines

-On [20010316 10:43], Eugene Polovnikov ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: >Please, review the following PR: >http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=25847 > >Same patch is in the attach. Just a question, the gif interface now part of the system does tunneling as well in as much the same way as nos-

nos-tun & multihomed machines

hi! Please, review the following PR: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=25847 Same patch is in the attach. -- -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.1 GCS/CC/IT d-@ s: a- C++ UBSC$ P++>+++@ L- E--- W+ N++ o? K? w>-- O- M- V- PS@ PE@ Y+ PGP>+ t 5 X R tv- b+++() DI-- D+(++)