Re: next panic: blockable sleep lock

2001-05-27 Thread Michael Harnois
On Sun, 27 May 2001 21:30:59 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > The ui_ref member in struct uidinfo is only 16 bits. This means > that a fatal wraparound due to a missing call to uifree() can > happen rather quickly. Great! With your patch and the earlier one from Thomas I can build wo

Re: next panic: blockable sleep lock

2001-05-27 Thread Tor . Egge
> freeing uidinfo: uid = 0, sbsize = 3197224 > freeing uidinfo: uid = 0, proccnt = 86 [...] > trap(c8d20018,c01d0010,c8cb0010,4,c0b3351c) at trap+0x5d0 > calltrap() at calltrap+0x5 > --- trap 0xc, eip = 0xc01ba652, esp = 0xc8d27ed4, ebp = 0xc8d27ee0 --- > _mtx_lock_sleep(c0b3351c,0,c035076c,364) a

next panic: blockable sleep lock

2001-05-26 Thread Michael Harnois
freeing uidinfo: uid = 0, sbsize = 3197224 freeing uidinfo: uid = 0, proccnt = 86 kernel trap 12 with interrupts disabled panic: blockable sleep lock (sleep mutex) Giant @ ../../vm/vm_fault.c:213 Debugger("panic") Stopped at Debugger+0x45: pushl %ebx db> t Debugger(c0350d9b) at Debugger+0x45 panic