At 10:15 PM 2/21/00 -0800, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
>> > Yes, a clean install.
>> > No, the sysinstall version of /etc/group did not have the tag.
>>
>> Ok, that's bad. I'm cc'ing Jordan so he can look into it. Thanks for th
>e
>> report. These are the little things that really need to be te
> > Yes, a clean install.
> > No, the sysinstall version of /etc/group did not have the tag.
>
> Ok, that's bad. I'm cc'ing Jordan so he can look into it. Thanks for th
e
> report. These are the little things that really need to be tested.
I'm not sure I understand this - sysinstall doesn
"Jeffrey J. Mountin" wrote:
>
> At 08:37 PM 2/21/00 -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
> > Hrrmm... so you did a clean install from floppies, etc. and the installed
> >version of /etc/group didn't have a $FreeBSD tag? I'm a little confused by
> >your account.
>
> Yes, a clean install.
> No, the sys
At 08:37 PM 2/21/00 -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
> Hrrmm... so you did a clean install from floppies, etc. and the installed
>version of /etc/group didn't have a $FreeBSD tag? I'm a little confused by
>your account.
Yes, a clean install.
No, the sysinstall version of /etc/group did not have t
"Jeffrey J. Mountin" wrote:
>
> Nothing major
>
> Finished a build, installed, and mergemaster points out that the $FreeBSD
> line is missing from the /etc/group binary install.
Hrrmm... so you did a clean install from floppies, etc. and the installed
version of /etc/group didn't ha
Nothing major
Finished a build, installed, and mergemaster points out that the $FreeBSD
line is missing from the /etc/group binary install. Only a touch
irritating. 'Twas the case with RC1 as well, but when I merged the temp
and original version it lumped the ID with a comment and the wheel
