:
:At 9:10 AM -0800 11/2/99, Doug Barton wrote:
:>Matthew Dillon wrote:
:> > I think it is necessary to make it exit for now, because what we are
:> > really doing is a net-0 gain in files... turning what used to be
:> > functionality in /etc/make.conf.local into /etc/make.conf. The
On Tue, 2 Nov 1999, Jason C. Wells wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Nov 1999, Doug Barton wrote:
>
> >> I think it is necessary to make it exit for now, because what we are
> >> really doing is a net-0 gain in files... turning what used to be
> >> functionality in /etc/make.conf.local into /etc/ma
At 9:10 AM -0800 11/2/99, Doug Barton wrote:
>Matthew Dillon wrote:
> > I think it is necessary to make it exit for now, because what we are
> > really doing is a net-0 gain in files... turning what used to be
> > functionality in /etc/make.conf.local into /etc/make.conf. The
> >
On Tue, Nov 02, 1999 at 10:41:19PM +, Jason C. Wells wrote:
> Put me down as wanting two files. An extra file is just more shtuff to
> keep track of. I too am iffy on /etc/defaults. If the purpose of defaults
> is to keep "standard" things in isolation then lets do that. Begrudgingly,
> defaul
On Tue, 2 Nov 1999, Doug Barton wrote:
>> I think it is necessary to make it exit for now, because what we are
>> really doing is a net-0 gain in files... turning what used to be
>> functionality in /etc/make.conf.local into /etc/make.conf. The intent is
>> not to add a third fil
Matthew Dillon wrote:
>
> :> sent to the CVS meisters to get /usr/src/etc/make.conf moved.
> :>
> :> make will dump out with an appropriate error and instructions if you
> :> update your source tree and still have an /etc/make.conf.local.
> :
> : I like this change (kind of) but
:> sent to the CVS meisters to get /usr/src/etc/make.conf moved.
:>
:> make will dump out with an appropriate error and instructions if you
:> update your source tree and still have an /etc/make.conf.local.
:
: I like this change (kind of) but is it really necessary to cause ma
Matthew Dillon wrote:
>
> (Approved by jkh)
>
> /etc/make.conf.local will become /etc/make.conf and /etc/make.conf will
> become /etc/defaults/make.conf. This change is long overdue.
>
> The sys.mk adjustment has already been committed. An email has been
> sent to the CVS
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Matthew Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I emailed Peter so as not to create any confusion because he seemed
> active at the time, but if either if you could move the file I would
> appreciate it!
Good, I've just done it.
Your best bet for CVS r
:
:In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Matthew
:Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
:
:> The sys.mk adjustment has already been committed. An email has
:> been sent to the CVS meisters to get /usr/src/etc/make.conf
:> moved.
:
:Are you sure? I didn't receive anything from you.
:
:John
:
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Matthew
Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The sys.mk adjustment has already been committed. An email has
> been sent to the CVS meisters to get /usr/src/etc/make.conf
> moved.
Are you sure? I didn't receive anything from you.
John
--
John Polst
(Approved by jkh)
/etc/make.conf.local will become /etc/make.conf and /etc/make.conf will
become /etc/defaults/make.conf. This change is long overdue.
The sys.mk adjustment has already been committed. An email has been
sent to the CVS meisters to get /usr/src/etc/make.conf
12 matches
Mail list logo
