Re: mballoc kernel thread

2002-12-29 Thread Bosko Milekic
On Mon, Dec 30, 2002 at 09:35:28AM +0900, Kyunghwan Kim wrote: > On Sun, Dec 29, 2002 at 06:47:35PM -0500, Bosko Milekic wrote: > > I don't really know what > > to tell you because I'm working on the exact same thing (and I > > mentionned in the Emails you brought up that I would be) except

Re: mballoc kernel thread

2002-12-29 Thread Kyunghwan Kim
On Sun, Dec 29, 2002 at 06:47:35PM -0500, Bosko Milekic wrote: > I don't really know what > to tell you because I'm working on the exact same thing (and I > mentionned in the Emails you brought up that I would be) except just > keep your code and go ahead and finish what you had intended bu

Re: mballoc kernel thread

2002-12-29 Thread Bosko Milekic
On Mon, Dec 30, 2002 at 02:35:49AM +0900, Kyunghwan Kim wrote: > I made a mballoc kernel thread that fills up mbufs and mbuf clusters > when number of mbufs/clusters of its general list is under low watermark > along with suggestions that Mr. Milekic has made around late November.

mballoc kernel thread

2002-12-29 Thread Kyunghwan Kim
I made a mballoc kernel thread that fills up mbufs and mbuf clusters when number of mbufs/clusters of its general list is under low watermark along with suggestions that Mr. Milekic has made around late November. http://redjade.org/doc/patches/mballoc_kproc.diff It seems useful until and even