On Fri, 10 May 2002 17:46:31 EST, "David W. Chapman Jr." wrote:
> > sysctl.conf is also missing. If its not there, it doesn't get
> > parsed. You only need make.conf if you wish to put stuff in there.
> > same with rc.conf, except everyone puts something in rc.conf
> >
> N/m on the sysctl
On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 05:40:11PM -0500, David W. Chapman Jr. wrote:
> On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 06:37:11PM -0400, Jeff Ito wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Is the lack of /etc/defaults/make.conf intentional? an oversite? or perhaps
> > something that I have messed up on my end?
> > I have run cvsup/merg
On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 06:37:11PM -0400, Jeff Ito wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is the lack of /etc/defaults/make.conf intentional? an oversite? or perhaps
> something that I have messed up on my end?
> I have run cvsup/mergemaster (18:30PM EST May 10. 2002), and that
> changes nothing. /usr/src/etc/*/* d
On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 06:37:11PM -0400, Jeff Ito wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is the lack of /etc/defaults/make.conf intentional? an oversite? or perhaps
> something that I have messed up on my end?
> I have run cvsup/mergemaster (18:30PM EST May 10. 2002), and that
> changes nothing. /usr/src/etc/*/* d
Hello,
Is the lack of /etc/defaults/make.conf intentional? an oversite? or perhaps
something that I have messed up on my end?
I have run cvsup/mergemaster (18:30PM EST May 10. 2002), and that
changes nothing. /usr/src/etc/*/* does not contain said file, the only place
it does exist is in /usr/sha
