On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 4:34 PM, Konstantin Belousov
wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 04:07:48PM +0200, Bernhard Fr?hlich wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 2:31 PM, Konstantin Belousov
>> wrote:
>> > On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 01:42:31PM +0200, Bernhard Fr?hlich wrote:
>> >> On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 04:07:48PM +0200, Bernhard Fr?hlich wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 2:31 PM, Konstantin Belousov
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 01:42:31PM +0200, Bernhard Fr?hlich wrote:
> >> On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 10:01 PM, Tim Kientzle wrote:
> >> >
> >> > On Aug 19, 2012, at 12
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 2:31 PM, Konstantin Belousov
wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 01:42:31PM +0200, Bernhard Fr?hlich wrote:
>> On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 10:01 PM, Tim Kientzle wrote:
>> >
>> > On Aug 19, 2012, at 12:17 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 9:45 AM, Tim K
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 05:28:09PM +0200, Bernhard Fr?hlich wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 2:31 PM, Konstantin Belousov
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 01:42:31PM +0200, Bernhard Fr?hlich wrote:
> >> On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 10:01 PM, Tim Kientzle wrote:
> >> >
> >> > On Aug 19, 2012, at 12
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 2:31 PM, Konstantin Belousov
wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 01:42:31PM +0200, Bernhard Fr?hlich wrote:
>> On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 10:01 PM, Tim Kientzle wrote:
>> >
>> > On Aug 19, 2012, at 12:17 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 9:45 AM, Tim K
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 2:31 PM, Konstantin Belousov
wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 01:42:31PM +0200, Bernhard Fr?hlich wrote:
>> On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 10:01 PM, Tim Kientzle wrote:
>> >
>> > On Aug 19, 2012, at 12:17 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 9:45 AM, Tim K
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 01:42:31PM +0200, Bernhard Fr?hlich wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 10:01 PM, Tim Kientzle wrote:
> >
> > On Aug 19, 2012, at 12:17 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> >
> >> On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 9:45 AM, Tim Kientzle wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Aug 12, 2012, at 6:20 AM, Paul Schenk
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 10:01 PM, Tim Kientzle wrote:
>
> On Aug 19, 2012, at 12:17 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 9:45 AM, Tim Kientzle wrote:
>>>
>>> On Aug 12, 2012, at 6:20 AM, Paul Schenkeveld wrote:
>>>
Hi,
I have a wrapper script that builds packages
On Aug 19, 2012, at 12:17 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 9:45 AM, Tim Kientzle wrote:
>>
>> On Aug 12, 2012, at 6:20 AM, Paul Schenkeveld wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I have a wrapper script that builds packages in a chroot environment
>>> which happily runs on release 6 thr
On Aug 12, 2012, at 6:20 AM, Paul Schenkeveld wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a wrapper script that builds packages in a chroot environment
> which happily runs on release 6 thru 9 and earlier 10 but fails with:
>
> tar: getvfsbyname failed: No such file or directory
>
> on a recent -CURRENT.
>
> Wh
Hi,
I have a wrapper script that builds packages in a chroot environment
which happily runs on release 6 thru 9 and earlier 10 but fails with:
tar: getvfsbyname failed: No such file or directory
on a recent -CURRENT.
What I could dig up so far is that "make package-recursive" calls
pkg_create
11 matches
Mail list logo