On 09/04/12 18:01, Ryan Stone wrote:
I have a Intel Sandy Bridge system that reports that it has SMT cores
instead of HTT(under a derivative of FreeBSD 8.2). I'll admit that I
don't at all understand the distinction between the two -- I thought
that HTT was just Intel's name for SMT. In any cas
on 04/09/2012 19:01 Ryan Stone said the following:
> I have a Intel Sandy Bridge system that reports that it has SMT cores
> instead of HTT(under a derivative of FreeBSD 8.2). I'll admit that I
> don't at all understand the distinction between the two -- I thought
> that HTT was just Intel's name
I have a Intel Sandy Bridge system that reports that it has SMT cores
instead of HTT(under a derivative of FreeBSD 8.2). I'll admit that I
don't at all understand the distinction between the two -- I thought
that HTT was just Intel's name for SMT. In any case, is there any
reason that machdep.hyp
