On Sat, 8 Jan 2000, FreeBSD wrote:
> list if you insist on attacking me there. Maybe Karl was right, some people
> in the FreeBSD organization really do think they are above the rest of us. I
> however do not share that belief. So, are you done?
If you had half of the etiquette and knowledge on
On Sun, 9 Jan 2000, Leif Neland wrote:
> While I do not agree with your idea of need of anonymity, I respect
your need for it.
>
> Could you not, instead of using the handle "FreeBSD", which sortof
already is taken :-), just assume a human name? The use of an obviously
not human name makes it un
> At 4:48 AM -0800 2000/1/9, Amancio Hasty wrote:
> > For instance, just because someone has an email name which resembles
> > a real name lets say "Brad Knowles" does not necessarily mean that the
> > real "Brad Knowles is sending the mail assuming of course that there
> > is a Brad Knowles.
>
> Since when does an E-mail address require a "realname"? Only a imbecile
> (IMHO) would use their real name on an e-mail that goes out to a public
> list. I don't want people to know my real name or SSN or any other personal
> info for that matter, NOR is it required, as far as I know. If it w
[ Moved to chat ]
> [Multiple irrelevant mailing-lists snipped.]
>
> < said:
>
> > Since when does an E-mail address require a "realname"?
>
> As Sherlock Holmes once said: ``It is always unpleasant dealing with
> an alias.''
>
> >plonk<
Boo... Hisss
Nate
;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;)
>
> While I do not agree with your idea of need of anonymity, I
> respect your need for it.
You don't have to agree and I appreciate your respect.
>
> Could you not, instead of using the handle "FreeBSD", which
> sortof already is taken :-), just assume a human name? The use of
> an obviously
Can we please end this discussion? End it now.
It's of no importance to me or, I venture to say, the postmaster
whether or not someone wishes to use an alias in these mailing lists
and it's certainly not a topic which follows the charter for the
FreeBSD-current mailing list. In fact, the only c
While I do not agree with your idea of need of anonymity, I respect your need for it.
Could you not, instead of using the handle "FreeBSD", which sortof already is taken
:-), just assume a human name? The use of an obviously not human name makes it
uncomfortable to communicate with you.
If you
> >
> > Indeed, I could adduser bknowels and use/be Brad Knowels (for
> all you know
> > my name could also be Brad Knowels) if he prefers. I'm not like
> that though.
> > Some people just aren't happy if they aren't complaining about
> something.
>
> At 4:48 AM -0800 2000/1/9, Amancio Hasty wrote:
>
> > For instance, just because someone has an email name which resembles
> > a real name lets say "Brad Knowles" does not necessarily mean that the
> > real "Brad Knowles is sending the mail assuming of course that there
> > is a Brad Know
>
> Indeed, I could adduser bknowels and use/be Brad Knowels (for all you know
> my name could also be Brad Knowels) if he prefers. I'm not like that though.
> Some people just aren't happy if they aren't complaining about something.
^^^
> > At 8:29 PM -0800 2000/1/8, FreeBSD wrote:
> >
> > > Again, I ask, if all you want to do is flame, take it to
> private e-mail and
> > > let's leave the lists out of this.
> >
> > I don't think you get the point. If you continue to use an alias
> > (as opposed to your real name), then
> At 8:29 PM -0800 2000/1/8, FreeBSD wrote:
>
> > Again, I ask, if all you want to do is flame, take it to
> private e-mail and
> > let's leave the lists out of this.
>
> I don't think you get the point. If you continue to use an alias
> (as opposed to your real name), then it looks lik
At 4:48 AM -0800 2000/1/9, Amancio Hasty wrote:
> For instance, just because someone has an email name which resembles
> a real name lets say "Brad Knowles" does not necessarily mean that the
> real "Brad Knowles is sending the mail assuming of course that there
> is a Brad Knowles.
> At 8:29 PM -0800 2000/1/8, FreeBSD wrote:
>
> > Again, I ask, if all you want to do is flame, take it to private e-mail and
> > let's leave the lists out of this.
>
> I don't think you get the point. If you continue to use an alias
> (as opposed to your real name), then it looks like
At 8:29 PM -0800 2000/1/8, FreeBSD wrote:
> Again, I ask, if all you want to do is flame, take it to private e-mail and
> let's leave the lists out of this.
I don't think you get the point. If you continue to use an alias
(as opposed to your real name), then it looks like everyone is
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Poul-Henning Kamp
> Sent: Saturday, January 08, 2000 8:08 PM
> To: FreeBSD
> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD. ORG
> Subject: Re: load spike strangeness
>
> I think you are
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "FreeBSD" writes:
>> As Sherlock Holmes once said: ``It is always unpleasant dealing with
>> an alias.''
>
>Mr. Holmes was a fictional character written in a time where there wasn't an
>internet. It's my belief that if he were real, and in our day and age, he
>woul
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Oliver Fromme
> Sent: Saturday, January 08, 2000 7:08 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: load spike strangeness
>
>
> FreeBSD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -Original Message-
> From: Garrett Wollman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Saturday, January 08, 2000 6:59 PM
> To: FreeBSD
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: load spike strangeness
>
>
> [Multiple irrelevant mailing-lists snipped.]
>
> < s
FreeBSD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in list.freebsd-stable:
>> FreeBSD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in list.freebsd-stable:
>> > Overclocking is *NEVER* recommended
>>
>> Neither is posting anonymously (without a realname).
>
> Since when does an E-mail address require a "realname"?
It is not
[Multiple irrelevant mailing-lists snipped.]
< said:
> Since when does an E-mail address require a "realname"?
As Sherlock Holmes once said: ``It is always unpleasant dealing with
an alias.''
>plonk<
-GAWollman
--
Garrett A. Wollman | O Siem / We are all family / O Siem / We're all the sam
:>
:
:Since when does an E-mail address require a "realname"? Only a imbecile
:(IMHO) would use their real name on an e-mail that goes out to a public
:list. I don't want people to know my real name or SSN or any other personal
:info for that matter, NOR is it required, as far as I know. If it we
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Oliver Fromme
> Sent: Saturday, January 08, 2000 6:06 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: load spike strangeness
>
>
> FreeBSD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
FreeBSD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in list.freebsd-stable:
> Overclocking is *NEVER* recommended
Neither is posting anonymously (without a realname).
(Sorry -- Back to the topic.)
I have to admit that I've seen the same symptoms, and I have
no idea what's causing it. It happenes very irregular
25 matches
Mail list logo
