On 11/9/10 9:59 AM, Alan Cox wrote:
Julian Elischer wrote:
On 11/9/10 9:04 AM, Bakul Shah wrote:
On Tue, 09 Nov 2010 08:45:14 PST Julian
Elischer wrote:
During the discussion at MeetBSD the question came up as to what
the real
limiting factors were with regard to how much RAM a system could
Julian Elischer wrote:
On 11/9/10 9:04 AM, Bakul Shah wrote:
On Tue, 09 Nov 2010 08:45:14 PST Julian
Elischer wrote:
During the discussion at MeetBSD the question came up as to what the
real
limiting factors were with regard to how much RAM a system could have.
it was put to us that the limi
On 11/9/10 9:04 AM, Bakul Shah wrote:
On Tue, 09 Nov 2010 08:45:14 PST Julian Elischer wrote:
During the discussion at MeetBSD the question came up as to what the real
limiting factors were with regard to how much RAM a system could have.
it was put to us that the limit was currently around 51
On Tue, 09 Nov 2010 08:45:14 PST Julian Elischer wrote:
> During the discussion at MeetBSD the question came up as to what the real
> limiting factors were with regard to how much RAM a system could have.
> it was put to us that the limit was currently around 512 GB, though no-one
> at teh discus
During the discussion at MeetBSD the question came up as to what the real
limiting factors were with regard to how much RAM a system could have.
it was put to us that the limit was currently around 512 GB, though no-one
at teh discussion knew what the mechanism of the limitation was or
what might
