On 7/15/14, Bruno Lauzé wrote:
> I was looking at dragonfly and why they have libdevattr and we don'tI really
> think having udev compatible api would open the door to a lot of software,
> imho.I feel it wouldn't be so complicated to port dragonfly kern_udev,
> libpr
I was looking at dragonfly and why they have libdevattr and we don'tI really
think having udev compatible api would open the door to a lot of software,
imho.I feel it wouldn't be so complicated to port dragonfly kern_udev, libprop
and libdevattr from dragonfly bsd.
Am i missing a p
