Re: latest version of threads library

2000-01-02 Thread Kip Macy
Do you know what the timeline is on this integration? -Kip On Sun, 2 Jan 2000, Daniel Eischen wrote: > Kip Macy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Sorry for sending this again but when I first sent it -current was > > embroiled in a flame war. > > > > I wou

Re: latest version of threads library

2000-01-02 Thread Daniel Eischen
Kip Macy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sorry for sending this again but when I first sent it -current was > embroiled in a flame war. > > I would like to use the latest threads source because my application does > not work correctly with the signal handling bugs in 3.x's threads. > However, it do

latest version of threads library

2000-01-02 Thread Kip Macy
Sorry for sending this again but when I first sent it -current was embroiled in a flame war. I would like to use the latest threads source because my application does not work correctly with the signal handling bugs in 3.x's threads. However, it does not appear that I can change it without rep

latest version of threads library

2000-01-02 Thread Kip Macy
I would like to use the latest threads source because my application does not work correctly with the signal handling bugs in 3.x's threads. However, it does not appear that I can change it without replacing all of libc. Is this correct? Or is there some simple change I can make to the files in li