"f.johan.beisser" writes:
>
>hrm, i'm sad to report that it did not work for me..
>
>let me know if you need output from it, i'll see about sending it to you.
>
>-- jan
>
>On Sun, 30 Apr 2000, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
>
>> Here's a simple patch which works for me.
>>
[patch deleted]
Well, I only ha
hrm, i'm sad to report that it did not work for me..
let me know if you need output from it, i'll see about sending it to you.
-- jan
On Sun, 30 Apr 2000, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> Here's a simple patch which works for me.
>
> --- /sys/netgraph/ng_base.c Sun Apr 30 11:32:22 2000
> +++ /sys/n
On Sun, 30 Apr 2000, Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven wrote:
> -On [2430 16:50], Boris Popov ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > This patch is not 100% correct. ng_base should make an attempt to
> >load module, not KLD. There was a new module_load() function proposed to
> >inclusion in the API, b
-On [2430 16:50], Boris Popov ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> This patch is not 100% correct. ng_base should make an attempt to
>load module, not KLD. There was a new module_load() function proposed to
>inclusion in the API, but for some reason it is not committed yet.
When Peter committed
On Sun, 30 Apr 2000, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> Here's a simple patch which works for me.
This patch is not 100% correct. ng_base should make an attempt to
load module, not KLD. There was a new module_load() function proposed to
inclusion in the API, but for some reason it is not committed
Here's a simple patch which works for me.
--- /sys/netgraph/ng_base.c Sun Apr 30 11:32:22 2000
+++ /sys/netgraph/ng_base.c_mod Sun Apr 30 11:40:24 2000
@@ -314,11 +314,16 @@
int error;
/* Not found, try to load it as a loadable module */
+#if 0