Re: kern/8324

2000-03-30 Thread Don Lewis
On Mar 20, 11:00am, Archie Cobbs wrote: } Subject: Re: kern/8324 } Don Lewis writes: } > This patch (vs the 3.4-STABLE version of tty.c) causes SIGIO to be } > sent when a regular or pseudo tty becomes writeable. } > } > } > --- tty.c.orig Sun Aug 29 09:26:09 1999 } > +

Re: kern/8324

2000-03-20 Thread Archie Cobbs
Don Lewis writes: > } * Archie Cobbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000317 17:55] wrote: > } > This bug has been around since at least 2.2.6 and is still present > } > in RELENG_3, RELENG_4, and -current. > } > > } > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=8324 > } > > } > Is anyone planning to tackl

Re: kern/8324

2000-03-18 Thread Don Lewis
On Mar 17, 6:27pm, Alfred Perlstein wrote: } Subject: Re: kern/8324 } * Archie Cobbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000317 17:55] wrote: } > This bug has been around since at least 2.2.6 and is still present } > in RELENG_3, RELENG_4, and -current. } > } > http://www.freebsd.org/c

Re: kern/8324

2000-03-17 Thread Bruce Evans
On Fri, 17 Mar 2000, Archie Cobbs wrote: > This bug has been around since at least 2.2.6 and is still present > in RELENG_3, RELENG_4, and -current. > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=8324 > > Is anyone planning to tackle it? What would be required to fix it? > (it's not clear (to

Re: kern/8324

2000-03-17 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* Archie Cobbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000317 17:55] wrote: > This bug has been around since at least 2.2.6 and is still present > in RELENG_3, RELENG_4, and -current. > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=8324 > > Is anyone planning to tackle it? What would be required to fix it? > (it'

kern/8324

2000-03-17 Thread Archie Cobbs
This bug has been around since at least 2.2.6 and is still present in RELENG_3, RELENG_4, and -current. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=8324 Is anyone planning to tackle it? What would be required to fix it? (it's not clear (to me anyway) from Bruce's description how hard this is to