Jim Bryant wrote:
> Hi, it looks like if_fpa.c has been modified again, but was checked
> into CVS untested.
Actually, the problem is the opposite.. It has not been modified, but some
of the old backwards compatability infrastructure got cleaned out, leaving
fpa broken. It doesn't appear to be t
Hi, it looks like if_fpa.c has been modified again, but was checked
into CVS untested.
from a basic GENERIC, with nothing other than the fddi and fpa devices
added to the config, I get the attached messages on compile.
also, i noticed that in pdareg.h, that the full duplex options are
included i
