Re: growfs(8) for FreeBSD

2000-12-08 Thread Warner Losh
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Goblin writes: : I can certainly see where "cat /dev/<1GBdevice> > /dev/<10GBdevice>" : situations would make a growfs useful w/out vinum... : : And, removing a failing disk from the end of a a vinum concat volume : would make shrinkfs really nice. I recently did

Re: growfs(8) for FreeBSD

2000-12-08 Thread Mike Smith
> So you can use it either with hardware RAID controllers which allow for > non destructive extending of the size of existing volumes at the end(!). Cool. We support the FlexRAID Virtual Sizing stuff on the AMI controllers already, and I bet that the Mylex MORE stuff would work too. > *

Re: growfs(8) for FreeBSD

2000-12-08 Thread Thomas
Hi, In an attempt to resolve that discussion: > > > No, vinum can do this alone. > > > But you couldn't grow the _fs_ after that, so there was no use for > > > this vinum feature. Exactly that was the motivation for writing that utility > >Okay, that is what I said ... "add an n+1 drive to ... a

Re: growfs(8) for FreeBSD

2000-12-08 Thread Goblin
I can certainly see where "cat /dev/<1GBdevice> > /dev/<10GBdevice>" situations would make a growfs useful w/out vinum... And, removing a failing disk from the end of a a vinum concat volume would make shrinkfs really nice. On 12/08, Rogier R. Mulhuijzen rearranged the electrons to read: > > >

Re: growfs(8) for FreeBSD

2000-12-08 Thread Rogier R. Mulhuijzen
> > > Stripe'd file systems (or concat ones) ... what growfs allows is someone > > > to add an n+1 drive to their RAID/Stripe and increase the size of the > file > > > > No, vinum can do this alone. > > > > But you couldn't grow the _fs_ after that, so there was no use for > > this vinum feature

Re: growfs(8) for FreeBSD

2000-12-08 Thread The Hermit Hacker
On Fri, 8 Dec 2000, Alexander Langer wrote: > Thus spake The Hermit Hacker ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > > > > Stripe'd file systems (or concat ones) ... what growfs allows is someone > > to add an n+1 drive to their RAID/Stripe and increase the size of the file > > No, vinum can do this alone. >

Re: growfs(8) for FreeBSD

2000-12-08 Thread Alexander Langer
Thus spake The Hermit Hacker ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > Stripe'd file systems (or concat ones) ... what growfs allows is someone > to add an n+1 drive to their RAID/Stripe and increase the size of the file No, vinum can do this alone. But you couldn't grow the _fs_ after that, so there was no us

Re: growfs(8) for FreeBSD

2000-12-07 Thread Michael C . Wu
milar. | | Thomas ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and me ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) have written a growfs(8) | for FreeBSD. Currently we can only grow unmounted file systems (in a clean | state) without any active snapshots inside. It is foreseen to enhance growfs to | grow mounted file systems as well, and handle a

Re: growfs(8) for FreeBSD

2000-12-07 Thread The Hermit Hacker
wrote: > >Hi, > > > >Due to vinum it is no problem to add disks and grow your volumes but up to > >now you couldn't easily make use of that new space for a file system, except > >using sequence of ufsdump/newfs/ufsrestore or something similar. > > > &

Re: growfs(8) for FreeBSD

2000-12-07 Thread Soren Schmidt
e or something similar. > > Thomas ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and me ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) have written a growfs(8) > for FreeBSD. Currently we can only grow unmounted file systems (in a clean > state) without any active snapshots inside. It is foreseen to enhance growfs to > grow mounted fil

Re: growfs(8) for FreeBSD

2000-12-07 Thread Rogier R. Mulhuijzen
e to vinum it is no problem to add disks and grow your volumes but up to >now you couldn't easily make use of that new space for a file system, except >using sequence of ufsdump/newfs/ufsrestore or something similar. > >Thomas ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and me ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) have written a

growfs(8) for FreeBSD

2000-12-07 Thread Christoph Herrmann
ten a growfs(8) for FreeBSD. Currently we can only grow unmounted file systems (in a clean state) without any active snapshots inside. It is foreseen to enhance growfs to grow mounted file systems as well, and handle active snapshots correctly. This requires some infrastructure which is then only availab