Craig Rodrigues wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 01:55:24PM -0500, Garrett Wollman wrote:
> > (We really should figure out how to implement the _r functions,
> > because a POSIX.1-2001 system with threads is supposed to have them.)
>
> How do these functions need to be implemented? Is it sufficie
On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 01:55:24PM -0500, Garrett Wollman wrote:
> (We really should figure out how to implement the _r functions,
> because a POSIX.1-2001 system with threads is supposed to have them.)
How do these functions need to be implemented? Is it sufficient
to re-implement the non-reentr
On Monday 06 January 2003 20:55, Garrett Wollman wrote:
> <
said:
> > #if defined(QT_THREAD_SUPPORT) &&
> > defined(_POSIX_THREAD_SAFE_FUNCTIONS)
>
> This conditional is erroneous, so you should definitely bug Troll
> Tech.
>
> It should instead read:
>
> #if defined(QT_THREAD_SUPPORT) && _POSIX_T
< said:
> #if defined(QT_THREAD_SUPPORT) && defined(_POSIX_THREAD_SAFE_FUNCTIONS)
This conditional is erroneous, so you should definitely bug Troll Tech.
It should instead read:
#if defined(QT_THREAD_SUPPORT) && _POSIX_THREAD_SAFE_FUNCTIONS - 0 > 0
(We really should figure out how to implement
Hi,
While trying to build the latest Qt (3.1.1) from original sources, it
fails because it cannot find getpwnam_r, which we appear to be missing
in -CURRENT at the moment, marked:
/*
* XXX missing getpwnam_r() and getpwuid_r().
*/
Qt tries to use this conditionally, using:
#if defined(QT_TH
