Re: fwd: [root: security check]

2000-09-11 Thread Visigoth
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 11 Sep 2000, David Malone wrote: > > Sounds like a good idea - we should also consider sorting the > output. On the positive side you don't get warned when you unmount > and remount a filesystem and it moves to the bottom of the list. > On t

Re: fwd: [root: security check]

2000-09-11 Thread David Malone
> I seem to recall that David Malone chose mount -p because mount without > options displayed information about sync- and asyn-c reads and writes. > Now, mount without options doesn't display this information. Wasn't me - I was doing seperate things with /etc/security and mount. > Therefore, I t

Re: fwd: [root: security check]

2000-09-11 Thread Sheldon Hearn
On Sat, 09 Sep 2000 12:25:28 EST, Steve Ames wrote: > Any way this can show what actually changed? 'mount -p' (which > /etc/security uses) doesn't show things such as soft-updates. In > fact I don't see a single mount option that does show everything... I seem to recall that David Malone chose

Re: fwd: [root: security check]

2000-09-09 Thread Ben Smithurst
Steve Ames wrote: >> virtual-voodoo.com changes in mounted filesystems: >> 6d5 >> < /dev/ad1s1g/source ufs rw 0 2 >> 8a8 >>> /dev/ad1s1g /source ufs rw 0 2 > > Got this is this morning's security check. This doesn't really > show a change. The actual change was from normal to soft-upda

fwd: [root: security check]

2000-09-09 Thread Steve Ames
> virtual-voodoo.com changes in mounted filesystems: > 6d5 > < /dev/ad1s1g /source ufs rw 0 2 > 8a8 > > /dev/ad1s1g /source ufs rw 0 2 Got this is this morning's security check. This doesn't really show a change. The actual change was from normal to soft-updates. Any way this can show what act