Aye, and my LS-120 works great too :) So, que sera sera.
Brian Feldman_ __ ___ ___ ___
gr...@unixhelp.org _ __ ___ | _ ) __| \
http://www.freebsd.org/ _ __ ___ | _ \__ \ |) |
FreeBSD: The Power to Serve!
I submitted a PR.
This is not a show-stopper. I have a system running 2.2.7. fd works
on that one. So, I read/write floppies there. It is a pain, though.
tomdean
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
It's been a couple more weeks, anyone now know why fd(4) is broken? It's
really not a good thing :(
Brian Feldman_ __ ___ ___ ___
gr...@unixhelp.org _ __ ___ | _ ) __| \
http://www.freebsd.org/ _ __ ___ | _
On Sat, 6 Mar 1999, Thomas Dean wrote:
So Does anyone have an idea why the hell fd(4) broke?!
> I have the same problem on 4.0-current SMP of Mon Feb 15 03:34:29 PST
> 1999.
>
> tomdean
>
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of
I have the same problem on 4.0-current SMP of Mon Feb 15 03:34:29 PST
1999.
tomdean
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
On Fri, 5 Mar 1999, Brian Feldman wrote:
> It seems that actually, not through my own fault, the fd driver is broken. I
> noticed this weeks ago but thought it a fluke since I only had the problem on
> one computer. However, on the school FreeBSD box, I also notice the same
> problem!
The point
It seems that actually, not through my own fault, the fd driver is broken. I
noticed this weeks ago but thought it a fluke since I only had the problem on
one computer. However, on the school FreeBSD box, I also notice the same
problem!
fd0: recal failed ST0 70 cyl 0
fd0: recal failed ST0 70 cyl
