On Wed, 2012-06-13 at 11:06 -0700, Sean Bruno wrote:
> > se> http://people.freebsd.org/~sbruno/est_man.txt
> >
> > Looks good. Attached a diff for some small fixes.
>
> Updated again with feedback that I've gotten.
>
> I changed the "Note that est interface is automatically loaded" to "Note
>
On Wed, 13 Jun 2012, Warren Block wrote:
On Wed, 13 Jun 2012, Sean Bruno wrote:
se> http://people.freebsd.org/~sbruno/est_man.txt
Looks good. Attached a diff for some small fixes.
Updated again with feedback that I've gotten.
I changed the "Note that est interface is automatically load
On Wed, 13 Jun 2012, Sean Bruno wrote:
se> http://people.freebsd.org/~sbruno/est_man.txt
Looks good. Attached a diff for some small fixes.
Updated again with feedback that I've gotten.
I changed the "Note that est interface is automatically loaded" to "Note
that est capabilities are auto
> se> http://people.freebsd.org/~sbruno/est_man.txt
>
> Looks good. Attached a diff for some small fixes.
Updated again with feedback that I've gotten.
I changed the "Note that est interface is automatically loaded" to "Note
that est capabilities are automatically loaded"
Sean
_
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 12:06:00PM +0900, Hiroki Sato wrote:
> Sean Bruno wrote
> in <1339531057.42366.2.ca...@powernoodle.corp.yahoo.com>:
>
> se> On Tue, 2012-06-05 at 14:13 -0700, Sean Bruno wrote:
> se> > On Tue, 2012-06-05 at 11:55 -0700, Sean Bruno wrote:
> se>
> se>
> se>
> se> allrighty
Sean Bruno wrote
in <1339531057.42366.2.ca...@powernoodle.corp.yahoo.com>:
se> On Tue, 2012-06-05 at 14:13 -0700, Sean Bruno wrote:
se> > On Tue, 2012-06-05 at 11:55 -0700, Sean Bruno wrote:
se>
se>
se>
se> allrighty, after some doc reviews by Glen, I've thwacked together a
se> quick and dirty
On Tue, 2012-06-05 at 14:13 -0700, Sean Bruno wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-06-05 at 11:55 -0700, Sean Bruno wrote:
allrighty, after some doc reviews by Glen, I've thwacked together a
quick and dirty est(4).
Any objections?
http://people.freebsd.org/~sbruno/est_man.txt
view via:
groff -S -P-h -Wall -
On Tue, 2012-06-05 at 11:55 -0700, Sean Bruno wrote:
> I note that x86/cpufreq/est.c has some tuneables and I have processors
> that seem to be not supported by est even though they appear to have
> Speedstep features:
>
> p4tcc0: on cpu0
> est1: on cpu1
> est: CPU supports Enhanced Speedstep,
I note that x86/cpufreq/est.c has some tuneables and I have processors
that seem to be not supported by est even though they appear to have
Speedstep features:
p4tcc0: on cpu0
est1: on cpu1
est: CPU supports Enhanced Speedstep, but is not recognized.
est: cpu_vendor GenuineIntel, msr 15
device_a