Re: driver maintainers, please help

2003-08-14 Thread Soeren Schmidt
It seems Lukas Ertl wrote: > Hi there, > > this is a call for help from the various driver maintainers. In a recent > discussion on -doc it has come out that several manpages are not in sync > with what's listed in the 5.1 Hardware Notes, and I'm currently trying to > update those manpages. Unfo

Re: driver maintainers, please help

2003-08-14 Thread Lukas Ertl
On Wed, 13 Aug 2003, Soeren Schmidt wrote: > > *) ata(4) - what are the supported UDMA levels for SiS 652, 751, and 752? > > { ATA_SIS652, 0x00, SIS_SOUTH, 0, ATA_UDMA6, "SiS 652" } > { ATA_SIS751, 0x00, SIS_SOUTH, 0, ATA_UDMA6, "SiS 751" } > { ATA_SIS752, 0x00, SIS_SOUTH, 0, ATA

driver maintainers, please help

2003-08-14 Thread Lukas Ertl
Hi there, this is a call for help from the various driver maintainers. In a recent discussion on -doc it has come out that several manpages are not in sync with what's listed in the 5.1 Hardware Notes, and I'm currently trying to update those manpages. Unfortunately, for some devices (especially

Re: driver maintainers, please help

2003-08-14 Thread David O'Brien
On Wed, Aug 13, 2003 at 03:11:35PM +0200, Lukas Ertl wrote: > this is a call for help from the various driver maintainers. In a recent > discussion on -doc it has come out that several manpages are not in sync > with what's listed in the 5.1 Hardware Notes, We also have several drivers in 5.1 tha

Re: driver maintainers, please help

2003-08-14 Thread Soeren Schmidt
It seems Lukas Ertl wrote: > On Wed, 13 Aug 2003, Soeren Schmidt wrote: > > > > *) ata(4) - what are the supported UDMA levels for SiS 652, 751, and 752? > > > > { ATA_SIS652, 0x00, SIS_SOUTH, 0, ATA_UDMA6, "SiS 652" } > > { ATA_SIS751, 0x00, SIS_SOUTH, 0, ATA_UDMA6, "SiS 751" } > >

Re: driver maintainers, please help

2003-08-14 Thread Wilko Bulte
On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 09:45:27AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > On Wed, Aug 13, 2003 at 03:11:35PM +0200, Lukas Ertl wrote: > > this is a call for help from the various driver maintainers. In a recent > > discussion on -doc it has come out that several manpages are not in sync > > with what's lis