On 24-Jan-00 Brad Knowles wrote:
> At 2:01 PM -0500 2000/1/24, John Baldwin wrote:
>
>> The new install system is probably going to use zip rather than bzip2.
>
> I'm curious as to how a choice like this gets made. Could you
> elaborate?
I did not make the choice personally, I believe
> At 2:01 PM -0500 2000/1/24, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> > The new install system is probably going to use zip rather than bzip2.
>
> I'm curious as to how a choice like this gets made. Could you elaborate?
Zip was selected because it's one of the few compressed bundle formats
that allows
On 23-Jan-00 Rod Taylor wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Jan 2000, you wrote:
>> On Sat, 22 Jan 2000, Rod Taylor wrote:
>>
>> > Personally, I'd like to see less stuff in the system source for
>> > smaller installs and lower compile time leaving it up to me to
>> > customize the individual stuff thats install
Alex Zepeda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 24 Jan 2000, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> > On 24-Jan-00 David O'Brien wrote:
> > > running Winloose, so I actually *CAN* run this in the background. I
> > > certainly was not idle while Bzip2 was compressing.
> > Its pretty annoying waiting for som
On Mon, 24 Jan 2000, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
>
> On 24-Jan-00 David O'Brien wrote:
> > running Winloose, so I actually *CAN* run this in the background. I
> > certainly was not idle while Bzip2 was compressing.
>
> Its pretty annoying waiting for something to compress if you want to do
> othe
On 24-Jan-00 David O'Brien wrote:
> running Winloose, so I actually *CAN* run this in the background. I
> certainly was not idle while Bzip2 was compressing.
Its pretty annoying waiting for something to compress if you want to do
other things that depend on it being compressed..
---
Daniel O
