--- David Wolfskill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm not obrien, but yes, that is exactly what it means.
Hmm, but I haven't defined it anywhere, and trust me on that, as I
cvsup'ed a clean copy of the 'src' tree today, an deleting the old one.
__
D
> Please verify my hypothesis by applying this patch:
>
>
> Index: contrib/binutils/bfd/sysdep.h
> ===
> RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/contrib/binutils/bfd/sysdep.h,v
> retrieving revision 1.1.1.6
> diff -u -r1.1.1.6 sysdep.h
> --- contri
On Sat, Mar 09, 2002 at 03:13:39AM +, Hiten Pandya wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am attaching the output you requested, but I am sure, this wouldn't
> be very helpful though:
>
> /usr/bin/cc (which cc)
> Using builtin specs.
> gcc version 2.95.3 20010315 (release) (cc -v)
>
> I also looked at all the M
Hi,
I am attaching the output you requested, but I am sure, this wouldn't
be very helpful though:
/usr/bin/cc (which cc)
Using builtin specs.
gcc version 2.95.3 20010315 (release) (cc -v)
I also looked at all the Makefiles, but couldn't find a problem related
to this. Out of curiosity, could
