On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, David O'Brien wrote:
> I'm convinced that if we are going to keep insisting that ACPI is enabled
> by default, we need to gather the various fixed AML's and commit them to
> the tree. I can't decide if they should be ports, or in /usr/src.
What are the copyright issues surro
On 17-Jan-2003 Terry Lambert wrote:
> John Baldwin wrote:
>> > For Intel, this is a win-win.
>> >
>> > For FreeBSD, unless Windows adopts the same code (which it will
>> > not do, since doing so will limit their market, just as using
>> > the code is currently limiting FreeBSD's market), it's a lo
John Baldwin wrote:
> > For Intel, this is a win-win.
> >
> > For FreeBSD, unless Windows adopts the same code (which it will
> > not do, since doing so will limit their market, just as using
> > the code is currently limiting FreeBSD's market), it's a lose-lose.
>
> Are you offering to write a ne
On 17-Jan-2003 Peter Schultz wrote:
> John Baldwin wrote:
>
>> On 16-Jan-2003 Terry Lambert wrote:
>>
>> >"Joel M. Baldwin" wrote:
>> >
>> >>I gather that there are quite a few Motherboards with bad ACPI asl's
>> >>on them. I know that my Abit BP6 sure has problems. As a result I
>> >>can't run
John Baldwin wrote:
On 16-Jan-2003 Terry Lambert wrote:
>"Joel M. Baldwin" wrote:
>
>>I gather that there are quite a few Motherboards with bad ACPI asl's
>>on them. I know that my Abit BP6 sure has problems. As a result I
>>can't run ACPI.
>>
>>What are those of us with these motherboards sup
On 16-Jan-2003 Terry Lambert wrote:
> Nate Lawson wrote:
>> On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, Terry Lambert wrote:
>> > Repeat: These machines work fine under Windows; the problem
>> > is not the BIOS, it's the OS's ASL interpreter.
>>
>> There's another wrinkle in that the interpreter is supplied by Intel.
>
On 16-Jan-2003 Terry Lambert wrote:
> "Joel M. Baldwin" wrote:
>> I gather that there are quite a few Motherboards with bad ACPI asl's
>> on them. I know that my Abit BP6 sure has problems. As a result I
>> can't run ACPI.
>>
>> What are those of us with these motherboards supposed to to?
>>
>
Nate Lawson wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, Terry Lambert wrote:
> > Repeat: These machines work fine under Windows; the problem
> > is not the BIOS, it's the OS's ASL interpreter.
>
> There's another wrinkle in that the interpreter is supplied by Intel.
> Some difficulties were _introduced_ by them
On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, Terry Lambert wrote:
> "Cagle, John (ISS-Houston)" wrote:
> > You might ask that question on the ACPI development list. I think there
> > are several people who have contributed patched ASL's for machines that
> > are broken. Here's a link:
> >
> > Acpi-devel mailing list
>
"Cagle, John (ISS-Houston)" wrote:
> You might ask that question on the ACPI development list. I think there
> are several people who have contributed patched ASL's for machines that
> are broken. Here's a link:
>
> Acpi-devel mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/list
"Joel M. Baldwin" wrote:
> I gather that there are quite a few Motherboards with bad ACPI asl's
> on them. I know that my Abit BP6 sure has problems. As a result I
> can't run ACPI.
>
> What are those of us with these motherboards supposed to to?
>
> I realize that we can use acpidump to get th
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 09:46:46AM -0800, Nate Lawson wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, Ducrot Bruno wrote:
> > It sound like a good idea. However, there is a lot of isssues evolved.
> > First, a DSDT table can and will be generated autmatically on the POST,
> > because at least the memory controller
On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, Ducrot Bruno wrote:
> It sound like a good idea. However, there is a lot of isssues evolved.
> First, a DSDT table can and will be generated autmatically on the POST,
> because at least the memory controller can have different configurations
> depending on the total amount of
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 07:35:35AM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 06:07:45AM -0800, Joel M. Baldwin wrote:
> > I gather that there are quite a few Motherboards with bad ACPI asl's
> > on them. I know that my Abit BP6 sure has problems. As a result I
> > can't run ACPI.
> >
[From address modified because I don't want every message in this
thread to end up in my personal mailbox. I'll read them in the
list, thank you.]
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 06:07:45AM -0800, Joel M. Baldwin wrote:
> I gather that there are quite a few Motherboards with bad ACPI asl's
> on them. I
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 08:44:20AM -0600, Cagle, John (ISS-Houston) wrote:
> You might ask that question on the ACPI development list. I think there
> are several people who have contributed patched ASL's for machines that
> are broken. Here's a link:
>
> Acpi-devel mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECT
ginal Message-
> From: Joel M. Baldwin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 8:08 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: bad ACPL asl's on motherboards
>
>
>
> I gather that there are quite a few Motherboards with bad
> ACPI asl
I gather that there are quite a few Motherboards with bad ACPI asl's
on them. I know that my Abit BP6 sure has problems. As a result I
can't run ACPI.
What are those of us with these motherboards supposed to to?
I realize that we can use acpidump to get the asl, correct it,
and then recompile
18 matches
Mail list logo
