On Thu, 2012-09-06 at 13:14 +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
> I tried to add
>
> RUN_DEPENDS=
> ${LOCALBASE}/lib/libatomic_ops.a:${PORTSDIR}/devel/libatomic_ops
>
> to my provided Makefile, but this doesn't install the port
> devel/libatomic_ops.
> This is weird and inconsistent. I follow exact the ste
On 09/06/12 12:16, Matthieu Volat wrote:
> On Wed, 05 Sep 2012 16:45:49 +0200
> "O. Hartmann" wrote:
>
>> Hello.
>>
>> FreeBSD has fallen back far behind the standards of modern scientific
>> computing and I dsperately look for solutions having OpenCL support on
>> FreeBSD anyway.
>>
>> I stumble
On 09/06/12 12:16, Matthieu Volat wrote:
> On Wed, 05 Sep 2012 16:45:49 +0200
> "O. Hartmann" wrote:
>
>> Hello.
>>
>> FreeBSD has fallen back far behind the standards of modern scientific
>> computing and I dsperately look for solutions having OpenCL support on
>> FreeBSD anyway.
>>
>> I stumble
On 05-09-2012 16:11, O. Hartmann wrote:
> Hello.
>
> While fiddling around with software that is looking for an include file
> "atomic_ops.h", which seems to reside in the FreeBSD operating system's
> sources with lib/lbkse, I'd like to know whether those architecture
> specific header files are i
On Wed, 2012-09-05 at 16:11 +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
> Hello.
>
> While fiddling around with software that is looking for an include file
> "atomic_ops.h", which seems to reside in the FreeBSD operating system's
> sources with lib/lbkse, I'd like to know whether those architecture
> specific head
Hello.
While fiddling around with software that is looking for an include file
"atomic_ops.h", which seems to reside in the FreeBSD operating system's
sources with lib/lbkse, I'd like to know whether those architecture
specific header files are installed in some places, where they could be
found b
