Re: ata-lowlevel.c ate my slave disc

2003-09-25 Thread Soren Schmidt
It seems Peter Wemm wrote: > > > Hi, I want to report a regression in ATAng. It's exactly same problem > > that Richard Nyberg reported on current@ 9 days ago. > > > > After updating to today -current, my system no longer see primary slave > > hard drive. It's one year old Seagate 80 GB hard driv

Re: ata-lowlevel.c ate my slave disc

2003-09-24 Thread Fred Souza
> FWIW, I have the same problem on my amd64 boxes at home. It will not see > the drive if its in slave mode. It too happens to be a seagate. > > > If I revert a 1.10 revision of ata-lowlevel.c (#ifdef 0 a section of > > probing code), the disc is back and works absolutely fine. > > I'll try the

Re: ata-lowlevel.c ate my slave disc

2003-09-24 Thread Peter Wemm
> Hi, I want to report a regression in ATAng. It's exactly same problem > that Richard Nyberg reported on current@ 9 days ago. > > After updating to today -current, my system no longer see primary slave > hard drive. It's one year old Seagate 80 GB hard drive. FWIW, I have the same problem on my

ata-lowlevel.c ate my slave disc

2003-09-24 Thread Pav Lucistnik
Hi, I want to report a regression in ATAng. It's exactly same problem that Richard Nyberg reported on current@ 9 days ago. After updating to today -current, my system no longer see primary slave hard drive. It's one year old Seagate 80 GB hard drive. If I revert a 1.10 revision of ata-lowlevel.c