Re: about in_multi_mtx @ netinet/in_mcast.c:1095

2010-09-11 Thread Weongyo Jeong
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 05:17:39PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > On Friday, September 10, 2010 4:28:58 pm Weongyo Jeong wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 02:32:52PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > > > On Thursday, September 09, 2010 1:41:46 pm Weongyo Jeong wrote: > > > > On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 09:36

Re: about in_multi_mtx @ netinet/in_mcast.c:1095

2010-09-10 Thread John Baldwin
On Friday, September 10, 2010 4:28:58 pm Weongyo Jeong wrote: > On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 02:32:52PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > > On Thursday, September 09, 2010 1:41:46 pm Weongyo Jeong wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 09:36:19AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > > > > On Wednesday, September 08, 2

Re: about in_multi_mtx @ netinet/in_mcast.c:1095

2010-09-10 Thread Weongyo Jeong
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 02:32:52PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > On Thursday, September 09, 2010 1:41:46 pm Weongyo Jeong wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 09:36:19AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > > > On Wednesday, September 08, 2010 4:14:19 pm Weongyo Jeong wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > I

Re: about in_multi_mtx @ netinet/in_mcast.c:1095

2010-09-09 Thread John Baldwin
On Thursday, September 09, 2010 1:41:46 pm Weongyo Jeong wrote: > On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 09:36:19AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > > On Wednesday, September 08, 2010 4:14:19 pm Weongyo Jeong wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > I have a question about IN_MULTI_LOCK() because it uses MTX_DEF flag > > > w

Re: about in_multi_mtx @ netinet/in_mcast.c:1095

2010-09-09 Thread Weongyo Jeong
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 09:36:19AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > On Wednesday, September 08, 2010 4:14:19 pm Weongyo Jeong wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I have a question about IN_MULTI_LOCK() because it uses MTX_DEF flag > > when it's initialized so I always encounters the following LOR > > > > lock

Re: about in_multi_mtx @ netinet/in_mcast.c:1095

2010-09-09 Thread John Baldwin
On Wednesday, September 08, 2010 4:14:19 pm Weongyo Jeong wrote: > Hello, > > I have a question about IN_MULTI_LOCK() because it uses MTX_DEF flag > when it's initialized so I always encounters the following LOR > > lock order reversal: (sleepable after non-sleepable) > 1st 0x80d0b560 in

about in_multi_mtx @ netinet/in_mcast.c:1095

2010-09-08 Thread Weongyo Jeong
Hello, I have a question about IN_MULTI_LOCK() because it uses MTX_DEF flag when it's initialized so I always encounters the following LOR lock order reversal: (sleepable after non-sleepable) 1st 0x80d0b560 in_multi_mtx (in_multi_mtx) @ netinet/in_mcast.c:1095 2nd 0xff00014e3850 USB