Brian Feldman writes:
> > any reason why the kernel "config" program shouldn't
> > be changed to dramatically reduce the requirement for
> > the silling quoting of option values??? if an option
> > needs embedded whitespace, but other than that,
> > is there any reason other than historical for
>
actually, i was there when Sam Leffler first wrote "config"
and that was never the intention, and that proposed fix would be
astoundingly silly
-mo
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
On Sun, 31 Jan 1999, Mike O'Dell wrote:
>
> any reason why the kernel "config" program shouldn't
> be changed to dramatically reduce the requirement for
> the silling quoting of option values??? if an option
> needs embedded whitespace, but other than that,
> is there any reason other than histo
any reason why the kernel "config" program shouldn't
be changed to dramatically reduce the requirement for
the silling quoting of option values??? if an option
needs embedded whitespace, but other than that,
is there any reason other than historical for
the silliness about nubmers, etc??
