Re: ZFS going forward, on stable/13 vs. main: question

2021-05-01 Thread Ryan Moeller
Question . . . Are there any potential future upgrade issues with main [so: 14] vs. stable/13 and releng/13.0 , say by main updates involving ZFS updates in a way stable/13 or the recent releng/13.* might not handle? There's no issue if you don't upgrade the pool on main with new features that

Re: ZFS going forward, on stable/13 vs. main: question

2021-04-30 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-current
[Just a resend: asking the question on the list less than an hour before the UTC month change might not be all that effective relative to those that just web browse the list to read it.] On 2021-Apr-30, at 16:21, Mark Millard wrote: > Context . . . > > I've been experimenting with ZFS and bectl

ZFS going forward, on stable/13 vs. main: question

2021-04-30 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-current
Context . . . I've been experimenting with ZFS and bectl use recently. It has been many years since I last used ZFS --and that was only a short experiment that did not have to deal with upgrades over time. I now have: # bectl list BE Active Mountpoint Space Created 13S-CA72-nodbg